Obama's Global Poverty Act - Here's the Evil in S.2433
A note from Radarsite: This is an extremely important article by our friend Maggie Thornton of Maggie's Notebook. I am making it a Read More in order to preserve all of the crucial emphasis and highlighting. This subject may well be one of the most threatening challenges to our great democratic nation that we have yet experienced. And yet, we know so little about it. Radarsite highly recommends this expose. Please read the whole piece -- our future may depend on ou understanding its implications. - rg
Cross posted from Maggie's Notebook
This post is a revision, for clarity, of a previous post. The issues are staggering, and while we might be compelled to believe that these things can never happen to America, read the following and see if you still feel, in today's devious world political climate that these evils cannot surmount our freedoms. Barack Obama's Global Poverty Act will undoubtedly cost the U.S. billions in new monies for foreign aid, but that' not the most important issue.
All text in red and all bold text is Maggie's emphasis.
The Secretary of State, Condoleesa Rice, her appointees with Congressional oversight by the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, the Senate Appropriations Committee, the House Foreign Affairs Committee and the House Appropriations Committee.
What do we know about the United Nations Development Program (UNDP)?
Follow the links and be prepared for sudden nausea.
Does the United Nations Accept the Rule of Law?
The UN's Gravy Train to Iran
Ros-Lehtinen Statement on UNICEF Ties to Saudi Extremist-Linked Charity
Report Shows U.N. Development Program Violated U.N. Law, Routinely Passed on Millions to North Korean Regime
The UN Corrupting Itself - A Chavez Connection
Does S.2433 require a specific strategy (some believe that it does not)?
The Bill says that we [the U.S.] will IMPLEMENT the achievement of the Millennium Development Goal? Can it be any clearer?
Does The Global Poverty Act subjugate the United States to the will of the United Nations?
Yes, and it does so through the United Nations' Millennium Development Goal. It is important to remember that the MDG is a U.N. program.
The following is the proof that the MDG is a "tax on the world" levied by the United Nations. The text addresses only the requirements to be placed upon the U.S. and other countries, it leaves out most of the goal of eradicating poverty and disease, and focuses on how that eradication will be accomplished.
Text taken directly from the U.N. General Assembly Millennium Forum.
The Forum (urges, advocates, calls upon or insists): The United Nations
To introduce binding codes of conduct for transnational companies and effective tax regulation on the international financial markets, investing this money in programmes for poverty eradication.
Here's a tax on international finances! Who are transnational companies?
To explore the feasibility of a legally binding convention on overcoming poverty, to be drafted in effective consultation and partnership with people living in poverty themselves.
To carry out the objective of moving towards the abolition of war by practical means, the United Nations Secretariat and interested Governments, or a separate group of Governments, should develop a draft proposal for global disarmament to be discussed in a fourth special session of the General Assembly on disarmament.
Someone, I think Orwell, said War is evil, but it is often the lesser evil.
The U.N. plans for globalism, with the U.N. at the head of the snake, to abolish war. They think they are God.
Read this whole explosive article here: http://maggiesnotebook.blogspot.com/2008/07/obamas-global-poverty-act-heres-evil-in.html
.jpg)
.jpg)
.BMP)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
This is scary. Obama wants to impose the UN rules over the Constitution. The thing is that the MSM won't cover this, but we will lose our freedom never the less.
ReplyDeleteIt has to be stopped.
The link to the full article is broken; here it is in full: here
ReplyDeleteSince it is my first post here, I'll go ahead and thank you profusely for your work both in your own writing and encapsulating other great authors under one virtual roof. I've known about this site for all of two weeks and already I surf here at least bi-daily. Again, thank you for your efforts!
You're right Findalis. Somehow this must be stopped.
ReplyDeleteTo Webmaster -- Thanks for the info about the broken link -- I think I fixed it.
And thank you very much for your kind words. Welcome belatedly to Radarsite.
rg
He'll be putty in the hands of the UN - if he isn't already.
ReplyDeleteHowever, he'll be able to promulgate their decisions in this country.
"We cannot continue to rely only on our military in order to achieve the national security objectives that we've set."
"We've got to have a civilian national security force that's just as powerful, just as strong, just as well funded."
Of course this only says that he will take money out of defense for the sake of his own committed ("as well funded") forces. It would be like a Waffen SS, or maybe like the Fedayeen Sadam.
Of course, nobody reported that statement in Iowa last December, so I guess I'm the paranoid.
When have we ever heard such a blatant statement of fascist intent in this country in the name of an administration? We may yet see a military coup in this country.
Roger, thanks for all your hard word to put this post up.
ReplyDeleteFindalis says it is scary, it is indeed, and especially because we cannot get it reported.
I just can't get over the fact that a nomination for President is in his future, with all we know about him, and with all we "guess at" because we cannot know.
Thanks again, so very much.
Maggie
Maggie's Notebook
It is pretty shrewd for Obama to take so many positions for popular convenience, even, as they often are contradictory.
ReplyDeleteIt allows him to say when challenged (if, God Help Us, even elected), that this is what I told the American people and they voted for me.
Manifestoes have used felxible truth before.
Anyone have a problem with that?
Look at the secondary school curricula from 1950 to 1960 and walk in downhill to the present.
You will find that the education system has done little other that indulge pupils in mediocrity and given diplomas for it.
Match the money spent (even considering inflation) and look at what the product is.
This demagogue from Chicago is in the pockets of these educators - who might have even forgotton how to teach "Spanish" or left someone with nothing more to say than "Merci...
Shawmut, I'll be a lot more interested in the U.S. teaching Spanish when the U.S. stops funding teaching English to illegals.
ReplyDeleteObama obviously doesn't know that many, many schools teach other languages, and Spanish is the most popular - just usually not in elementary.
Great line: Manifestoes have used flexible truth before.
Maggie
Maggie's Notebook