Monday, May 19, 2008

Gary Fouse: Latest Report From UCI

Gary Fouse's Latest Report From UCI

Cross posted from

Below is my email to Rusty Kennedy, Director of Orange County, Human Relations Office-and his nasty reply to me. I had been warned that writing to him would be a waste of time-and it was.His response is first-then my original letter. I will send my response in another posting to follow.

Dear Mr. Fouse
Thank you for sharing your perspective on the issues pertaining to UCI and the state of Jewish/Muslim/Arab relations there. The OC Human Relations Commission has been deeply involved at the request of the UCI administration, students, faculty and community groups for many years on campus seeking to build a safe, inclusive community where bigotry is frowned upon. In our years of experience at UCI we have attended the events of all of the sides in this struggle to inform our perspective. We have engaged in conversations, dialogues, discussions and disagreements with all sides. We also carry this work out on other college campuses in Orange County where similar issues arise.

Additionally since our inception in 1971 we have provided comprehensive intergroup relations and tolerance teaching programs that reach over 40,000 students in OC schools annually. We founded in 1991 and have hosted regular meetings/trainings since then of the Hate Crime Network a broad based community/law enforcement network dedicated to building a community wide collaboration at responding to and preventing hate crimes and incidents. We conduct police and community trainings, forums, leadership development programs and dialogues to build understanding between diverse communities that make up Orange County.

Where I agree with you in some of your characterizations of hate mongers who have spoken in OC and at UCI, and regularly speak up to condemn this bigotry, I take strong exception to your comments about UCI and particularly your insulting, demeaning and inaccurate statements about the administration. In our extensive experience with the UCI administration we have never heard any of them address the concerns that you outline, (and I think they all share) with anything but appropriate concern. And we have never heard them calling those community members who speak out on this, Jewish and others, anything derogatory. In fact, I have seen them time and again address even the most passing comments of hate, bigotry or fear as absolutely top priority, seeking to document, investigate and appropriately respond.

I do not know what you have done to address the bigotry that exists in our community, on campus and across our country, but I have seen the extraordinary steps taken by UCI administration, from the Chancellor, to the Vice-Chancellor, to the Dean of Students, on down through the ranks to condemn bigotry, respond decisively to hate crime, and to set a community standard that works to discourage hate. I see that you go on with statements like, "the leadership of this university clearly has no concern for the concerns of Jewish students". Rather than respond to this unfair comment I will let the Jewish students speak for themselves as to the lack of veracity of your claim.

You report that you are risking your job to speak up for what is right, this is a noble act. I would hope that you would be more thoughtful about your accusations and hostility to well meaning efforts; more constructive in your engagement; more mindful of the impact of your diatribe; if indeed you seek to do what is right.

Sincerely rusty
Rusty Kennedy,
Executive Director Orange County Human Relations Commission
1300 S. Grand, Bldg B Santa Ana, CA 92705
714-567-7470 fax 714-567-7474 MISSION: Fostering mutual understanding among residents and eliminating prejudice, intolerance and discrimination in order to make Orange County a better place for ALL people to live, work and do business.

-----Original Message-----
From: []
Sent: Saturday, May 17, 2008 12:32 PM
To: Kennedy, Rusty
Subject: Anti-Semitism at UCI

Dear Mr Kennedy, My name is Gary Fouse, and I am an adjunct teacher at UCI-Ext (ESL). I have been in that position since 1998 (subsequent to my retirement from the Drug Enforcement Administration. I am writing to you per the suggestion of Dr Brian Levin, CSUSB to give you my perspective as a teacher at UCI regarding the quarterly events hosted by the Muslim Student Union on our campus. Recently, I have heard that various figures in the university administration have described critics of the MSU events and their speakers as "hysterical Jews", "troublemakers, "outside groups", etc.

I am neither a "hysterical Jew" (I am not even Jewish) nor am I an outsider. I have seen and heard what is happening for several years. I can tell you:

1 The claims of hate speech made by Jewish students are justified. When one listens to the words of Amir Abdel Malik Ali, Abdel Musa, Mohammed Al-Asi, we hear them call for the destruction of Israel, glorify suicide bombers as heroes and martyrs, rail about "Zionist Jews", call for the destruction of the Jewish state, defend Hizbollah and Hamas, condemn America, call Jews, "lowlife ghetto-dwellers" (Al-Asi) on and on and on.

This past week, the "Wall" erected by the MSU had a characterture of Ariel Sharon, drawn with a hooked nose and oversized lips, exactly in the style of Julius Streicher's, Der Stuermer, the virulent, anti-Jewish newspaper of the Nazi era. How was this allowed to appear on a university campus? Also this week, during Al-Asi's speech in front of the flagpoles, while he was spouting his racist rhetoric, a group of about 20-30 small schoolchildren were gathered yards away by their bus listening to this man's vile words. Meanwhile, university deans (who are known to be antagonistic toward the Jewish students' concerns, were scurrying around like hall monitors, moving peaceful Jewish student protestors with their "hate Speech" warning posters here and there and keeping walkways open while ignoring the kids being exposed to this garbage.

2 The leadership of this university clearly has no concern for the concerns of Jewish students. They have dismissed numerous complaints and shown every indication that they are more sympathetic to the MSU and their inciteful speakers. This past week, David Horowitz, in his talk at UCI, described UCI as the worst university campus in the nation when it comes to MSU radicalism. There were two deans in the audience, one of whom took copius notes on her laptop, yet none of them even attempted to defend the university in the question and answer session.

When I told Mr Horowitz that 99% of the students at UCI were not involved in this ugliness, I told him that we had 2 problems: the MSU and an administration that is hiding under their desks, either out of fear, apathy or they just don't care about their Jewish students. They did not respond to me either. They can't. Why is it that hundreds turn out to hear and applaud the words of Hamas/Hizbollah, Iran supporter, Norman Finklestein including numerous deans and faculty, but only 20 come to hear Nonie Darwish, a courageous woman who has left Islam, condemned terror and defended the US and Israel? I was the only faculty member present (and I am only a part-timer). No deans (except one pacing outside the hallway who could not bring himself in to hear Ms Darwish's words) were present.

Sir, as a part-time teacher, who has no tenure nor long-term contract, I am fully aware that what I am doing and saying jeopardizes my continued employment at UCI. They don't even have to fire me-just tell me they have no available classes for me next quarter. I am willing to accept those consequences to stand up for what is right. This is not about free speech. It is about inciteful speech. If this situation is not addressed, someday there will be a tragedy on the campus, and everyone will be wringing their hands wondering how it could happen at UCI. I won't be wondering.

I thank you for your attention, and you may feel free to share this letter with whomever you deem appropriate.

Gary Fouse Adjunct teacher UCI-Ext-ESL


Below is my response to Rusty Kennedy, Director of Orange County, Human Relations Office.

There is an attachment i put at the bottom from this morning's Red County blog that reporting an incident Thursday night when 6 Muslim students allegedly accosted a jewish female after a speaking event by Amir Abdel Malik Ali.

Dear Mr Kennedy, I am sorry that you took offense to my email. You probably think that I am some radical "bomb thrower". I am neither. I am retired from law enforcement (DEA). As such, I know a volatile situation when I see it, and I have seen it for several years at UCI. What I am is a concerned citizen simply reaching out to those who should be concerned about hate speech on a university campus. I will not engage in further debate with you on the performance of the UCI Administration. I have expressed my opinion, and you have expressed yours. I will stand by what I said. I should state that I was warned that writing to your office was a waste of time, and I won't take up any more of your valuable time. I would, however, like to attach a posting from this morning's Red County blog about an incident that reportedly happened at UCI last Thursday night. I have no personal knowledge and cannot vouch for it, but I will attach it for whatever inquiry you may deem appropriate. It makes reference to the response of the university, in this case, the campus police.

UCI PD Allow Muslim Students to Attack Jewish Woman

Posted by: Jonathan Constantine

05/18/2008 9:38 PM T

The attacks from MSU members continued after Amir Abdel Malik-Ali's evening lecture. According to a member of the Orange County community who witnessed the event, a young Jewish female who was filming the event was followed back to her car and surrounded by 6 male members of the Muslim Student Union. When officers from the UCI Police Department arrived at the scene, they stood idly by and watched as the Muslim students began to assail the witness.

When the witness (turned victim) called the police department for answers, they explained that the MSU members were just "getting back at the Jews:" "On Thursday May15, 2008 I went to the UCI campus to hear a talk: Death to Apartheid, A Farewell to Zionism. Since much of my life was spent fighting the apartheid system in my native country of South Africa, I was interested to hear speakers who probably had not personally lived through that time. I noticed that there were many people filming the speaker's presentation. Afterwards, I walked to my car in the university underground parking. I noticed a young woman standing backed up against her car. She was surrounded by at least 6 males who appeared to be of university age. There was an additional young man who appeared to be with the girl. She looked scared and I asked her if she was OK. She said she had called 911.

I have 4 children aged 22-30, and was very concerned for her safety. I did notice she had a camera and that she was not engaged in talking with the 6 males that had surrounded her and her car. I thought they wanted her camera but she was not taking photos. She told me that they wanted to see the license plate on her car. Since they were not the police, I thought this to be very strange. I realized that they were trying to photograph her license plate.

I breathed a sigh of relief when the police arrived. I attempted to describe to them the scene that I had just witnessed. The policeman replied sarcastically: "good ---- do you feel better now that you got that off your chest". I was shocked! My emotions had swung like a pendulum. From the initial fear at seeing the young woman being harassed, to relief at the sight of the police, and now back to fear, as I the realized that the arrival of the police would not provide the protection that I had anticipated. At this point it occurred to me that these were University of California, Irvine campus police.

I know that police are usually interested in a witness statement, and what I saw was intimidation of two people in a parking lot who were outnumbered 3 to 1. To my amazement the police refused to take a witness statement from me. By asking the girl if she was OK, I had somehow become involved in this altercation, and now my safety was in jeopardy. After the officer had expressed his disinterest in my account, I turned to enter my car to head home. The patrol car, though, was blocking my vehicle and preventing my exit.

At this point another woman came walking by. I was too afraid to speak, but welcomed seeing another woman there. She said it was not safe to be there in the parking structure and that I should try to get out. I showed her that I could not, since my car was blocked. I asked if she was part of the university administration, as I did not think she was a student. She said that she just happened to be walking through the parking lot - I remembered thinking that it was strange that it was after 10 pm and this is not a parking lot you just walk through. I shrugged off my suspicions. The woman then told me that I could go to other "meetings" with her. She described the meetings as the same as the ones held on campus, but at different venues, such as hotels.

At that minute the young boy who had been with the girl student ran over to me and asked for my phone number. Simultaneously, the police angrily shouted to him to get into his car. After the woman left, I noticed that one of the "intimidators" was situated on the hood of my car in an attempt to photograph the VIN number under the windshield ( he lifted up the windshield wiper to get a better look at the number). He glared at me in a way I will describe as intimidating and menacing. Then he took photos of my car's license plate, and then snapped photos of me.

All the while the police officers were present and did absolutely nothing! I asked for their card and told them that if anything were to happen to my person, family or property, that I will hold them and the university responsible. Once I arrived home, I called the Irvine police and old them what had happened. I asked if it was reasonable for the police to not take a statement or to protect me, and that was definitely not the protocol. It was recommended that I speak to the watch commander. I was put through to them and a lady Lori said she would call him. I told her my concern was about what I saw in the parking garage.

After awhile she said he was not available and she further informed me of the following: the 2 people in the parking lot were Jewish and they had been harassing the Muslim students on campus during the day, and the Muslim students were simply getting back at them. I had not asked her what the incident was about, but she volunteered that information. I told her that what I saw was two people outnumbered and surrounded in the parking structure, and I was concerned because the girl looked terrified. It was ludicrous to portray her as capable of harassing anyone. I told her that I did not feel safe and that I was phoning to report the lack of concern on the part of the police to take my eyewitness account.

They did nothing to assure that I got safely out of the parking structure.

I have reported this to the university and have been told that someone would contact me. My complaint to the campus police has so far gone unanswered, as well. Even if the 2 Jewish students had in some way "wronged" the Muslim students earlier that day, was it appropriate for the Muslim students to take things into their own hands? Is vigilantism now acceptable and legal on University of California campuses? The incident has left me struggling with many things.

How do the police come to a conclusion regarding this event, while refusing to take a witness statement? If I was scared, how do students feel when confronted with menacing behavior? If we can not depend on police officers to protect us and to intervene in a tense situation, who can we depend on? What were they waiting for - property damage or physical injury? Is the university administration and their campus police in charge of maintaining law and order and a safe campus environment? Or do they allow gangs of students to assume control of the campus through intimidation?"

Thank you for your time and attention,

Gary Fouse

Interesting visitors:
ISP: California State University San Bernardino
Entry Page Time: 20th May 2008 11:57:59
Location: San Bernardino, California, United States
Entry Page:

A note from Radarsite: This is the latest in the ongoing series of volatile articles from faculty member Gary Fouse on the undeniable atmosphere of antisemitism at UCI and the administrations obvious culpability.


  1. Gary Fouse in his letter address specific problem occurring on the UCI campus all he got was a form letter. Not one of his concerns were addressed nor was there going to be any action. This is typical of such organizations as the Orange County Human Relations Commission. It isn't until there is a major crime committed with racial overtones do they finally step in. Or when a student or faculty member decides to take legal action.

    Organizations like the Orange County Human Relations Commission are not there to protect a person's rights, but to make brownie points for a politician or two.

  2. You are correct. Mr Kennedy did not address any of the specific details in my letter. Hopefully, he will take some interest in the incident last Thursday night since he think UCi is doing a hell of a job.

  3. Judging by the response from Rusty Kennedy, he's got his head firmly cemented into the ground. No problem, all good, nothing to see, move along. Don't hold your breath about him doing anything about the second incident either, i have a feeling there will be lots of misplaced files and bureaucracy that must be followed.

  4. Gary Fouse' letter raises a point that we seem to over-looking (or I've failed to recognize).
    Should we clearly see these inicidents as "hate crimes"? And, should we reach that conclusion, and find organization behind them, then we have "organized crime", for which, as the authorities have been notified, they are subject to the same RICO statutes that broke the Hezbollah ring out of Charlotte, NC.
    This would lead to investigate their funding, and even if only supported financially by immediate members, it would be identified as a "purpose".
    Unfortunately, plotting the cases and connecting the dots is straining upon anyone's patience, but, at this stage any effort is meritable.
    Each complaint should be publicized; each provocaton must be amplified in its detail, every man-hour cost should be amplified as well.
    And every element of official indifference should be protrayed as cowardly.
    Many of these groups have the dead-weight and its energy mass of PC working for them. Many it's time to use that judo principle of working that strength against them.

  5. The double standard / moral inversion is at work at UCI. This is not a soluble problem in the short term.

    Infiltrating the MSA would be extremely difficult, and would not likely be productive due to compartmentalization.

    There is only one solution. We all know what it is.

  6. My impression is that the OCHRC is a liberal agency that takes a selective view of hate speech and acts of hate-depending on who the victim is. I hope Mr Kennedy will prove me wrong. It appears he is in the tank with UCI.

  7. In dealing with Mr. Kennedy and his ilk of PC (philosophically constipated), you (we) are dealing with "The Best Men Money (probably rials) Can Buy". It's elitist corruption; clear and simple.

  8. If any concerned citizens are interested in contacting Mr Kennedy to inquire as to whether he intends to look into the incident at UCI, here is his address:

    Rusty Kennedy, Executive Director
    Orange County Human Relations Commission
    1300 Grand Bl, bldg 8
    Santa Ana, CA 92705
    (714) 567-7470
    fax (714) 567-7474

    Oh, and tell him Gary sent you.

  9. PS: Rusty kennedy's email is:

  10. Towards the end of your letter to Mr. Kennedy you 'predict' that, if nothing is done about such events and attitudes, there would be a tragedy on UCI campus, over which the authorities would then wring their hands.

    Can I take the liberty of amplifying your statement? and point out that the OCHRC's attitude - and unwilligness to act - is not unique to that organization. Rather, it can be found in other places in the U.S. and in many places in Europe. And, if not checked - and reversed - will result in worldwide tragedy.