Civil Rights or Civil Life? Britain's "42-day" Debate

Al Qaeda wouldn't hesitate to blow away a city: That's why we need 42-day detention, says ex MI6 boss

From the Daily Mail
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/articles/news/news.html?in_article_id=562276&in_page_id=1770
By JASON LEWIS

Warning: Sir Richard Dearlove says that in some serious cases the current 28-day limit is not enoughThe former head of MI6 is backing controversial Government plans to hold terror suspects for 42 days without charge, saying it might prevent a dirty-bomb attack on Britain.
MI6 prides itself on avoiding political debates but former chief Sir Richard Dearlove warns that the UK would "regret" not bringing in longer detention for terror suspects.


Sir Richard, 63, who retired from MI6 in 2004, says that in some serious cases the current 28-day limit is not enough to build a case or to gather intelligence on the scale of the threat faced by Britain.
He says of Al Qaeda: "Should it ever obtain the means to blow away a complete city, I fear, with good intelligence that supports my fears, that it would not hesitate to try."
His intervention comes after Director of Public Prosecution Sir Ken Macdonald warned MPs on the Home Affairs Committee on Wednesday that any move to extend the period suspects can be held is unnecessary.
He said he had "managed quite comfortably" within the 28-day limit – and no suspect had been held longer than 14 days in the past nine months.
But writing in Contingency Today, a magazine for security professionals, Sir Richard says the increased complexity of terrorism cases, especially the need for help from spy agencies abroad, means investigators need more time.
"In some states simply establishing identity is a major investigative challenge," he says. "When we do need that extension, we will need it badly."
Al Qaeda "does not fight for a claim to territory, nor for a political agenda. It seeks to destroy our values and our way of life" – and it is "already pressing against the limits of our capabilities to contain it".
He adds: "It knows well how to exploit the vulnerability of the global village – how to pass unnoticed, cover its tracks, ride on our technology. In a recent prosecution, the investigation involved 270 computers, 2,000 disks and 8,224 exhibits spread across eight national jurisdictions."
He is "instinctively against the erosion of the basic liberties" but adds: "When I know that a few of my fellow citizens feel they are justified in the name of some greater purpose to attempt to kill their neighbours, then I want them, where and when necessary, to be effectively constrained.
"If 42 days is not adopted, regret it we will – and who in our blame culture will the media turn on when the uncharged terrorist, released after a month, turns out to have held the key to preventing the next major attack, and what bad law might we then, in haste, enact during the crisis-driven enquiry that would ensue?"

Note from Radarsite: Contained in that one small word "but" is the whole dilemma of the West. Recognizing the necessity of these crucial exceptions to our everyday rules of civility is the key to success in this ongoing war. We must win this war against this ruthless onslaught of militant Islam. But first we must win the war against the Ken Macdonalds of this world, these dangerously delusional PC libs, who still think that this is some sort of collegiate debate, to be governed by gentlemanly rules of conduct. We can only hope that the responsible voices of reason, like Sir Richard Dearlove's clear warning will be heeded in time.
rg