Friday, December 26, 2008

"Obsession" -The Film

Cross-posted by Gary Fouse

Today, for the first time, I viewed the film "Obsession", a documentary about radical Islam. It is something I should have seen a long time ago, and not because I learned anything new from it. I decided I wanted to see if was a hate-mongering film as people like CAIR claim. Is the film unfair? Does it paint all Muslims as terrorists or terrorist-supporters? I say no to both questions.

The film, which is 27 minutes long (and available on the Internet), begins with the message that most Muslms do not support terror, and that the film is not about them. It is about radical Islam and the threat it poses to the world in general and the West in particular.

In watching the film, one does not have to depend on the words of non-Muslims (except for a handful of terrorism experts like Steve Emerson), rather the viewer only has to watch and listen to the words of radical Muslim clerics and other figures who declare the Islam will take over the world and destroy other religions. One need only view the speeches which were broadcast on Saudi, Iranian or Palestinian TV. Listen also to the words of those who left Islam over the issue of terror like Walid Shoebat and Nonie Darwish. The images shown of Muslim attacks on non-Muslims are documented history-from 9-11 to the Madrid train bombings to the London subway attacks. (Mumbai had not yet occurred when the film was produced.)

This documentary is not a result of the wild imagination of Muslim-bashers. It is fact. The purpose of the film is not to bash innocent Muslims; rather, it is to try and wake up compliant Westerners who refuse to face the truth.

There is also some important history in the film, especially in reference to the Grand Mufti of Jerusalem, Haj Amin el Husseini, who was a close ally of Hitler and actually spent some years in Nazi Germany. While there, he broadcast anti-Semitic messages to the Arab world over a Nazi radio channel. During the war, he actually organized a Muslim army division in Bosnia which fought alongside the Germans. What did the Mufti and Hitler have in common? They both wanted to eradicate Jews.

Organizations like CAIR must realize that a film of this nature (which is factual) cannot be suppressed in the West or simply condemned as a form of hate speech. Had the film tried to impart the idea that all Muslims are our enemy, then I would myself condemn it. Instead, leading Muslim organizations, if they truly desire peaceful co-existence, must do their part to combat those who preach hate, conquest and violence.

Recently, there was a reported "gas attack" on a Dayton, Ohio mosque that occurred in the wake of the local dissemination of the "Obsession" film. The film was blamed by Islamic leaders for inspiring the so-called attack. Yet, at this point, all indications point to there having been no such attack. It appears that it was at most a case of a Muslim child getting hold of a can of pepper spray inside the mosque and innocently spraying another child while the adults were having a service. If that is, in fact, the case, then "Obsession" had no role whatsoever.

I encourage everyone to view the film including Muslims. If there is something in this film that is not factual, I would like to hear about it.


  1. Whenever a courageous person brings the truth about Islamic terror to the light he or she is vilified by the media and CAIR as a bigot. Yet not one Muslim group has condemned the attacks in Mumbai.

    The world will believe the lies since they are told loudly and frequently. But they will be horrified when the truth comes out in the next major terror attack in the West. Yet they will not condemn.

  2. Findalis,

    a slight correction: CAIR and the Islamic Society of North America have condemned the attacks in Mumbai.

    The problem is that in their short statements, they mention neither the fact that the attackers were Muslims, nor the fact that a Jewish center was attacked.

    As I pointed out in my blog, if you read their statements, you are left wondering if the attackers were Swedish extremists fighting for the liberation of Lapland.

    Nowhere in those statements is there any expression of shame that the attackers were Muslims. Nowhere is there mention of the cancer that infects Islam. Nowhere is there any questioning or looking inward at how Muslims could do such things.

    And that is just in the US.

  3. Findalis;
    A slight correction on my part; The statement on the ISNA web site does now mention the Chabad House as one of the targets in Mumbai.

  4. I saw this a while back, at the recommendation of ALa (Blonde Sagacity). I was stunned.

    By allowing (and barking tolerance), we (as a group) are moving beyond tolerance into acceptance and approval - the wrong direction to be going, for sure - a bare step away from stepping off the edge and into active participation.

    Wonderful post, as always, Gary; and wonderful comments, as always, Findalis!

  5. Actually, the full-length film is much longer than 27 minutes.

    That said, the film clearly sends the message that most Muslms do not support terror. Objections from CAIR and like groups are nonsense.