Sunday, December 9, 2007

New Rules of Engagement














Published by Wake Up America - September 21, 2007
mhtml:file://C:\Documents%20and%20Settings\HP_Administrator\My%20Documents\Wake%20Up%20America\Wake%20up%20America%20New%20Rules%20of%20Engagement.mht!http://wwwwakeupamericans-spree.blogspot.com/2007/09/new-rules-of-engagement.html
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"An article that echoes the sentiments of all thinking people.
Sadly these thoughts are never heard in the corridors of power".
-- DFO Australia

------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Earlier this week, in a truly frightening post on Susan Duclos’ Wake up America blog, a new and appalling terror threat was revealed. Referred to as “Jihad Boom”, this latest outrage against humanity involves nine postcards mailed out to nine public schools in the Florida area, containing graphic bomb threats, specifically targeting these schools and their children.
If this isn’t a “wake up call”, then I don’t know what more it would take.

It’s time to take off the gloves, America. It’s time for new rules of engagement.

To prepare ourselves for this battle we must begin by taking a refresher course in self-defense. Our first lesson must be to insure that we have a clear and unobstructed understanding of what it is we are defending and, further, we must firmly believe that it is indeed worth defending.

We are living in an new era, the Age of Unreason. We are being ruled by a ruthless and unyielding dictator who hides under the benign title of Political Correctness. This tyrant requires nothing less of us than our complete and unquestioning obedience to his rules of conduct. His ironclad laws permeate every area of our existence, even penetrating into our innermost thoughts. He vigorously supports and enforces these regulations through a formidable array of propaganda, misinformation and outright lies.

Like all tyrants and professional propagandists, he propagates these lies through an effective combination of coercion, intimidation and endless repetition. The tyrant succeeds when the people eventually weaken and become completely and utterly convinced that the tyrant’s agenda is the only path to real truth, and that the goal of righteousness — i.e. “right thinking” — can only be achieved by the strictest adherence to his dictates.
Hitler, Stalin and Mao Zedong all thoroughly understood these principles and used them masterfully. Their followers were not merely loyal, they were rapturous in their zeal.
And God help the dissenters.

As George Orwell famously pointed out in his prescient “1984″, in order to control the people’s thinking, one must first control their language. We have unwittingly succumbed to a new form of Doublespeak; it is called Multiculturalism. We have been told what we can say and what we cannot say. We have been taught the right way to think and the wrong way to think. To our shame, we have meekly acquiesced without debate to this insane suspension of disbelief. The foundation of this monstrous lie is the incredible premise that all people are basically the same and are all driven by the same general motivations.

Not only is this statement completely unfounded, it is inherently preposterous. We have been coerced into accepting the ludicrous idea that all peoples, and all nations are operating under the same precepts of universal justice and morality.
The only differences between them, we are assured, lie in their unique customs and rituals. We are forbidden to even acknowledge that there may in fact be some manifest differences between cultures more meaningful and profound than mere customs.
We are forbidden to even comment on the individual characteristics of different peoples or different races. Anyone attempting to broach this taboo subject is immediately met with loud admonishments of “racism” or “prejudice”.
However, even more proscribed than a critical appraisal of differing races is any form whatsoever of objective criticism of anyone’s religion — anyone’s, that is, but our own. This breach of the rules of Doublespeak is considered to be the highest form of Multicultural treason.

We are precluded from making even the most obvious and benign observations of the world around us. Multiculturalism has become our new religion; a religion based upon a revealed truth which we have been forbidden to question. To merely frame the question constitutes the crime.

Case in point: All nations and peoples, we are reminded repeatedly, are to be considered equal: yet, when was the last time you heard about a bloody revolution in Scandinavia?

Now, how about in South America?

I am not a racist, I am a culturist. Culture matters. Although this statement will undoubtedly be considered the highest form of Multicultural heresy, I’m going to say it anyway. There are superior and inferior cultures. I realize that, to some, this smacks of Nazi Arianism, but it’s nonetheless true. And that’s what this conversation is all about — breaking free of the shackles of Doublespeak and finding the courage to speak the truth.

As former Ambassador Jeane Kirkpatrick put it so succinctly, “Americans need to face the truth about themselves, no matter how pleasant it is.” We are simply the greatest, most honorable, most generous, most judicious nation in the world. Our advanced Western culture isn’t just different from that Middle Eastern version of Islam, which is causing the world so many problems right now — it is vastly superior to it. We have progressed a thousand years beyond their backward-looking medieval and barbarous practices. We don’t decapitate our journalists, teach our innocent young children to be suicide bombers or stone our adulterers. We don’t say it’s our religion or death. We don’t murder our cartoonists or our writers.

As Dinesh D’Souza phrased the questions so accurately — When was the last time you heard about a Muslim invention that didn’t involve bomb-making? Or, when was the last time a Muslim made the world’s headlines for something other than terrorism?

To be forbidden to make these blatantly obvious comparisons between peoples and cultures, to be forced to ignore these self-evident truths in the name of some delusional concept of Political Correctness is not only grossly dishonest, it is becoming increasingly self-destructive.

How can we defeat an enemy whom we have been forbidden to even identify, for fear of demonizing the Devil?

We are a superior civilization who has been infected by an inferior civilization who is attempting to destroy us from within. We are being intimidated and threatened and we have been told that to fight back in any way against this vicious enemy is both unjust and immoral.

Somehow, and very soon, we must cut through this miasma of Multicultural deception and grasp the truth. We must call a spade a spade.

These imminent threats to our very existence are not coming from the Irish or the French; nor the Hindus or the Catholics or the Jews. They are coming from the Muslims; and those Muslims who most closely follow the teachings of the Prophet are the terrorists; while those so-called “moderate Muslims” are, in the Islamist’s view, considered apostates, and for the most part have chosen to remain mum.

We must fight back, and we must fight with the weapons of truth.

I’m not willing to wait until our children have been slaughtered –
are you?

------------------------------------------------------------------------
Comments cross posted from Wake Up America:

"We are living in an new era, the Age of Unreason. We are being ruled by a ruthless and unyielding dictator who hides under the benign title of Political Correctness. This tyrant requires nothing less of us than our complete and unquestioning obedience to his rules of conduct. His ironclad laws permeate every area of our existence, even penetrating into our innermost thoughts. He vigorously supports and enforces these regulations through a formidable array of propaganda, misinformation and outright lies."

That is arguably the most profound statement of our time.

And amen to it.
Hawk | Homepage | 09.21.07 - 8:05 pm | #

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

he writes good doesn't he?

Great Job Roger.
spree | Homepage | 09.21.07 - 8:06 pm | #

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Thank you Hawk. I left a special notice to all of you in the group. You guys are all great!
And thank you Spree, once again.
Roger W. Gardner | Homepage | 09.21.07 - 8:51 pm | #

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Excellent article Rogerguy...I just sincerely wish more people would wake up and see the danger before their eyes!
Miss Beth | Homepage | 09.22.07 - 12:53 am | #

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Roger, I know I will take a beating for this , but I for one did not think your article was "Excellent" I did find it rather good and almost on point. Perhaps I am just mistaken on my understanding as well but we will see. I agreed with you that multiculturalism is killing us. It is growing an entire generation that has no sense of identity. Every one wants to be African American, Italian American, Irish American, when in fact they are just American. Political correctness is also killing us and I agree there. I thought you made good points on both topics. Where I do draw the line is where you said that there were indeed "inferior" people.
Would you then toss aside the Declaration of Independence that tells all Americans that all men were created equal?
To be inferior means to be "less important, less valuable,or less worthy." Surely you can not mean that.
If this were true based on the culture of people then the slaves were justly enslaved because they were "inferior" they did no acts of science and culture, they cut the heads off of people, so they deserved it? The American indian was justly wiped out then because of his inferiority? I dont know if this is getting too long so I will continue in another post
JMC | 09.22.07 - 2:51 pm | #

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

All men were created equal. I will agree with my founding fathers on that one. All that is different is that we are privileged enough to have grown up in a place where the founding fathers opened the eyes of the people around them and for generations to come a new way of life and liberty that ensures the unalienable rights of it people. It is because of that ,that we are privileged to have escaped the trappings of theocracies like you have in the middle east. It is because of that , that we dont just execute but we try by juries. Does this make us superior? NO! It puts us in a better state of being and a more livable and enjoyable and justified existance but it does not mean that we are somehow worth more. If we are superior and they inferior then why not just nuke Iraq and get them out of the way? Because we recognize the worth of all human life on the same level and are trying to open the eyes of the people of what they are trapped in. again I will continue below
JMC | 09.22.07 - 2:56 pm | #

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

you say we dont "decapitate our journalists" NO your right, but we do have a number of people who throw babies in dumpsters and in trash cans. "we dont teach our children to be suicide bombers and stone adulterers" No we dont , we just dont teach our children at all, and we put our adulterers in the white house. "we dont say its our religion or death" No we just declare war on religion."we dont murder our cartoonists or our writers" No we praise them when they glorify murder and break moral boundaries. I am not saying that we should kill them or start practicing the muslim way of life FAR BE IT! What I am suggesting is that what we think is awful about them, they think is equally awful about us.
I would not say that any one is inferior. are they misguided? perhaps, are they twisted perhaps, but life is life and people are people and sometimes we need to give those people a chance to open their eyes before we declare them inferior and send them off to the gas chambers. Perhaps they are happy in their lifestyle even after they see what we offer. then let them live it.
A doctor is not superior to a plumber because he has a higher education. the doctor can not fix a pipe and a plumber can not fix a heart, neither is inferior.
again I will continue one last time
JMC | 09.22.07 - 3:07 pm | #

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

I just moved to a new neighborhood. my old one no one talked to eachother and no one helped each other out. Yet in my new neighborhood we all help eachother out. My neighbor broke his leg and for the last couple months everyone has taken turns to mow his lawn. My drive way washed out in a storm we had and without asking my neighbors all came and helped me fill it back in. We had a guy with a leaky roof and we pitched in to help him. We have each other over for dinner, we watch for each others kids, we treat every one like we would want to be treated. I didnt grow up in a place like that. I grew up where neighbors treated each other like crap. When I came to my new place was I "inferior" because my new neighbors cared for the value of eachother some time even over themselves? No I was shown a new way to live and it opened my eyes. Now I enjoy living side by side with those I consider my equals , my friends, my neighbors.
Please tell my you dont actually believe that some people on this earth are inferior because of the culture they were brought up in. Disadvantaged yes, but more reason to celebrate the United States Citizenship we were all blessed to be born under. More reason to spread our love and generosity and not our hate and lord over any one .
please correct me if I misspoke. I will gladly listen to you and would like to understand greater where your idea of inferiority is meant to fit in.
JMC | 09.22.07 - 3:14 pm | #

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Yes, JMC -- the poor jihadis are just disadvantaged -- there, does that make you feel better. The differences I'm writing about are not the same as differences between doctors and plumbers -- and somehow, in spite of yourself, I think you know that. I also think that you know exactly what I meant but purposely chose to ignore it so that you could get up on your soapbox and preach to us.

Your liberal BS is exactly what I'm fighting against. You think that you are fighting the good fight on the side of the angels. You are so self-satisfied with your borrowed opinions. In reality all you are doing with your liberal nonsense is aiding and abetting the enemy.

Do you honestly think that by reframing my clearly defined positions to fit into your tired old arguments that I'm going to change them?
If anything you only serve to validate everything I'm writing about.

There are indeed superior and inferior cultures, for precisely the reasons that I put forth.

And yes, I would definitely bomb Iran and not think twice about it.

In your misguided view you still think that this all boils down to a gentlemanly debate, it's just a matter of semantics. Well, I'm sorry JMC, but you're wrong. It is a matter of life and death. And you are on the wrong side.
Roger W. Gardner | Homepage | 09.22.07 - 4:26 pm | #

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Kill all Jihadim.

Period.

No dot com.

Zap them all.
Snooper | Homepage | 09.22.07 - 4:59 pm | #

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

There you go, Snooper!
You always manage to get right to the heart of it.

IHHR
Roger W. Gardner | Homepage | 09.22.07 - 5:02 pm | #

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Lock and load, amigo!

We can't afford to sit around and "negotiate" with them.

The more we sit and talk, the more they laugh at us and plot more destruction.

Saddle up!
Hawk | Homepage | 09.22.07 - 5:15 pm | #

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Roger, it wasnt so clearly defined because I actually wanted to know where you stood. Apparently you really do think there are certain people who are of less human than others.
I am no liberal sir, and I didnt mean to come across as on a soap box if that is how it was. I wanted to get to the bottom of what you were saying.
I did not need you to insert your sarcasm with the "poor jihadists" they are clearly enemy combatants, but as someone who has faced them in battle trust me when I say they are just as human as you and I and thus there is hope.
If there is no hope for the "inferiors" then lets just blow them up and bring our troops home because we are just wasting time with an "inferior" group who will never change.
I knew I would be immediately assaulted by you. Your way or the Highway. what else is to be expected from a man who views others as inferior.
There is a healthy view of the enemy sir and then there is a hatred that makes you no better than the enemy.
I am sorry you are so offended that I put forth my views and they were different. I am sorry that you did not get a full hug and embrace for your ideas from me but such is the wonderful idea that we can think and speak freely.
I stated I would gladly listen to you But listening to you talk and listening to you bash are two different things. I apologized in my original posting if I was mistaken and yet you offered no further explanation , you just offered condemnation and sarcasm. I am sorry to see that.
I am sorry to spree that it took me four posts to get my idea across, I will try to cut it down. and talk shorter and for the sake of discussion post in increments so as not to come across on a soap box and perhaps settle any questions in shorter form.
I am sorry roger it looks like we will just have to agree to disagree.
JMC | 09.22.07 - 5:19 pm | #

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

See, that is where I disagree JMC, I thought Rogers intent was clearly defined and obvious even.
spree | Homepage | 09.22.07 - 5:36 pm | #

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

No, I no longer just agree to disagree with liberals such as yourself. You are wrong. You are not only wrong but you are hurting our country. You are giving the enemy a podium to speak from.

You are stuck in exactly the same place as those delusional students and faculty at Columbia. You STILL think that we are in the debating stage with our enemies. What is it going to take for you to wake up? A nuclear bomb on New York City? The slaughter of our innocent children?

You brought up the American Indians, so I'll be more than happy to deal with that subject -- in fact, this is a perfect example of what I'm writing about.
The culture of the American Indian was primitive and brutal. It had remained virtually unchanged for ten thousand years. The differences between the Indians of, say, 9,000 years B.C. and the Indians of the 19th century is almost non-existent.
During the last two thousand years Western civilization grew and changed and flourished.
The differences between those inhabitants of the Western world at the time of Christ and now is incalcuable.

Does this mean that I think it's that all right to kill Indians? No.
Does this mean that I'm happy that those representatives of our Western world won out and subsumed that brutal and stagnant Inferior culture into their own higher culture? Absolutely.

And, if you're not happy about that outcome, then either you're delusional or you should move to a reservation.

Multiculturalists like yourself, pick one or two traits out of an otherwise backward and unproductive culture and go on and on about it. The American Indian becomes a "Noble Savage".
I can only wonder, if you have read any of the accounts of white captives who have survived the tortures of their brutal captivity, why your side always seems to conveniently neglect these rather obvious truths?

The American Indians had many admirable traits; but am I glad that our side won? You're damn right I am.

You see yourself as a reasonable person attempting to take part in a reasonable debate with an unreasonable man.
I see you as an enemy.

And I do not just agree to disagree with you. I will fight you every chance I get.
Roger W. Gardner | Homepage | 09.22.07 - 6:22 pm | #

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

One thing more. You said that you have fought for your country. If that is indeed the case then I truly honor your sacrifice and thank you for your service. To me, it only makes it all the sadder that you are on the wrong side of this critical question.

You further state that you are not a liberal -- yet all of your talking points are straight out of the liberal's playbook.

When I was growing up, and we went to the movies, there was little doubt when watching our favorite Westerns who the good guys and the bad guys were. The good guy was wearing a white hat and was being chased by about a dozen Indians. He' d swing around in the saddle a fire one shot from his six-shooter and five Indians would fall off their horses.

Then the sixties and seventies rolled around. And the surest way of alienating yourself from everyone at that cocktail party (including all the good-looking women) -- worse than the worst case of BO -- was daring to say anything at all critical about the noble American Indians.

Both extremes were a travesty of history.

The truth, however, was pretty simple.
An inferior civilization had been conquered and subsumed by a superior civilization.
The way in which these wars were conducted was inevitably murderous and brutal.
But the right side one. Period.
Roger W. Gardner | Homepage | 09.22.07 - 7:03 pm | #

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Sorry for the typo. "one" should obviously be "won".
Roger W. Gardner | Homepage | 09.22.07 - 7:07 pm | #

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

JMC---I think (and Roger, correct me if I'm wrong in my assumption) the keystone here is indeed a misunderstanding.

Roger is not saying PEOPLE are inferior--he's saying the CULTURES are inferior. There's a huge difference there.

And I have to agree, the entire islam culture is indeed inferior in that it has stagnated and come to a grinding halt. It took the rantings of a misogynisitc madman and grew from that poisoned fruit into the very real threat we see and face today. Their own "holy" (and I use that term very loosely) book exhorts extreme violence toward all who do not agree while suppressing fully 1/2 of the population (women), including sexual mutilation, stonings, honor killings, considering rape victims as criminals (as long as it's women, of course). I find nothing, NOTHING redeeming about the culture.

I DO see a people who is yearning for freedom, a chance to grow and become a part of the 21st century--and yet they have no clue how to do so because they've been repressed by the thugs for so long. The steps are tentative, yes...but they are there.

The culture is pure poison. They are reminiscent of two year olds who, when they don't get their way, go on a screaming rampage of violence. It can be seen simply by how they've been stewards to their lands.

Israel, forced onto a small, rocky, barren area, while the best lands went to others, has turned that country, that barren land, into an oasis. Look at the lands surrounding her. Is it any wonder everyone wants Israel? And yet, what would they do with her once they got her? Simple--destroy her as they've destroyed their own lands.

No, JMC, I don't think it's the PEOPLE Roger means--I believe it's the CULTURES.
Miss Beth | Homepage | 09.22.07 - 7:08 pm | #

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

I repeat...

Kill all Jihadim.

Period.

No dot com.

Zap them all.

I have faced them in battle and they are NOT, repeat, NOT on the same moral plane as we are. We respect life. We abhor war. But, if we are to have a war, let us win the damn thing and be done with it.

It IS that simple.

My son will now face them in battle and the likes of the troll JMC, a supporter of the losers of ReidCo do nothing but enable and embolden the enemy.

When we get done with this war, they are next.
Snooper | Homepage | 09.22.07 - 7:09 pm | #

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Thank you, Miss Beth. That is of course exactly my meaning. The only thing I might disagree with you about is whether our friend truly "misunderstood" my statements, or deliberately conflated them with racist and prejudicial rantings, in order to make his liberal talking points. I suspect the later.
Roger W. Gardner | Homepage | 09.22.07 - 7:31 pm | #

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

I'm in a somewhat mellow mood today--it's dark, cloudy and stormy and I'm watching movies with my daughter with intermittent spurts of cleaning up a bit. Been a very long week, completely emotionally exhausting and I just need to rest. So, in my mellowness, I'm trying to give benefits of the doubt--for the moment.
Miss Beth | Homepage | 09.22.07 - 7:45 pm | #

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

I think perhaps I might see things a little differently about those people who are trynig to be free. Just as with Germany after 1939, after that country began invading other countries and slaughtering the Jews, what those "good German people" really thought about Hitler quickly became a moot point. Unfortunately, we had to defeat Germany, not just the Nazis.

The time left for these "good Muslims" to get on the right side of history is fast approaching -- especially in Iran.
If things keep going in the same direction -- just as with Germany in the 40s -- the Western world will be forced to react. And it might be exceedingly difficult to separate out the "good Iranians" from the" bad Iranians".

I truly hope that things will take a whole other direction. But right now it doesn't look to hopeful.

Miss Beth, I think I know exactly where you're coming from, and you are being kind and reasonable. And much of what you say is true. It's just that I fear events are, once again, going to overtake reason.
Roger W. Gardner | Homepage | 09.22.07 - 7:46 pm | #

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Ben posted an excellent post over at my place yesterday about moderate muslims trying to break free and calling for the eradication of the violent verses in the koran and titled Muslims Against sharia...I linked the site to mine and to me, it shows a hope of those trying to break free of the murderous culture. Here's the link:

http://missbethsvictorydance.blo...nst-sharia.html
Miss Beth | Homepage | 09.22.07 - 7:48 pm | #

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

I'm sorry, Miss Beth. Please -- go on and enjoy your well-deserved quiet time. The same arguments will be here tomorrow.
Luvya.
Roger
Roger W. Gardner | Homepage | 09.22.07 - 7:49 pm | #

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Thanks Roger...I'm just so darned drained..I may just go back to bed for awhile (I only slept 12 hours for starters...lol)

luvya, too!
Miss Beth | Homepage | 09.22.07 - 7:53 pm | #

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

STOP BEING MUSHY!!

LOL!!

The time to "chat" with the enemy has long passed.

The ONLY reason they want to "chat" is to buy them more time.

Diplomacy does one thing and one thing only...it delays the inevitable. It always has and always will.
Snooper | Homepage | 09.22.07 - 8:15 pm | #

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Actually, in thinking more about it, there are plans out there re: Iran that could get the job done without too much loss of civilian life.
We'll see..
Roger W. Gardner | Homepage | 09.22.07 - 8:17 pm | #

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

You're right, Snooper. I agree 100%. The reckoning is coming.

PS: I pray for your son every night.

Roger
Roger W. Gardner | Homepage | 09.22.07 - 8:23 pm | #

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Hey Roger - very cool piece. Political Correctness is the very def of intolerance. I gave ye a plug at right truth. Plus, I got to use the word 'eschew' in it!

The superiority of Western Civ is not about 'Guns, Germs and Steel" Or Colonialism, neocolonialism, Imperialism, exploitation, wicked trade practices like mercantilism or capitalism. It's all about unbridaled, free inquiry. Only in the West did it blossum into the age of enlightenment.
courtneyme109 | Homepage | 09.22.07 - 8:31 pm | #

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Miss Beth, thank you for being calm and talking to me.
I have been stewing over this in my mind for quite some time now, I even went and re read the article.
I suppose my hang up is where you pointed out. The separation of people and culture.
I don't really see them as two distinct things. I think calling a culture inferior is calling a people inferior. Even in the article it states that the differences go deeper than mere customs , so it must mean the people? or am I mistaken. (I am sure that will be bombarded with hate comments)
Make no mistake about it. I think that their ideas are dangerous, I think that their motives are hate, and I would call radical islam an enemy, but I will not call the muslim people inferior. Again I stand with the founding fathers who stated that all men were created equal.
Roger do not call me your enemy and then say you honor my service. You dont even beleive that my intentions here are honest and yet you do not know me.
spree can attest that I have not posted anything in hate. Miss Beth has seen my name here before. I have been respectful , I ask questions when there is a disconnect with my understanding. I would rather ask and gain an understanding than just say stuff like your a liberal, your my enemy. It is a shame that all you can come back with is blasting hatred.
Having you say I am hurting my country SCREW YOU ! you know nothing of the sacrifices I have made, You know nothing of the places I have been, and nothing of the things I have been through. HOW DARE YOU! and that is the first thing I have ever stated in anger and the only thing I have stated with a deliberate agenda. The agenda being to say SCREW YOU! All I wanted was more explanation what I got was ignorant bashing. I am done talking on this subject. I enjoy the site, it is a good source of news and I thought opinions but perhaps not because if you misunderstand or disagree your an enemy.
JMC | 09.22.07 - 9:34 pm | #

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

I generally let a debate go, especially when I didn't author the original thought provoking article to begin with but I will say this once to all.

Step back, take a deep breath.

Then everyone reread everyone elses answers.

The problem as I see it is everyone is trying to determine an underlying motive towards each others answer.

I see every comment has that element.

It has already been stated that the article DOES separate culture from people...take that at face value JMC.

Roger, JMC has commented here before and he doesn't deal in the hatred of the far liberal left at all.

With that said, JMC, you are offended at Rogers making assumptions about you, well HE also had the right to be offended that after it was explained that the culture and the people were separated, you did exactly what you accused him of doing, you argued about what HE wrote and his intent.

So, everyone, reread each others comments and take them at face value and stop trying to apply "hidden intent" and start dealing with stated intent instead.
spree | Homepage | 09.22.07 - 9:46 pm | #

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Absolutely right, Courtney.

I did see your comments and thank you very much.

I just left some comments on your blogsite.

This has proven to be an interesting debate.


We'll see where it goes from here --

LOL

Rogerguy.
Roger W. Gardner | Homepage | 09.22.07 - 9:51 pm | #

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

JMC, I have to disagree with you regarding separating people from cultures, and I'll try to explain.

I believe, FIRMLY, that every child born, is a complete and total innocent, regardless of where or to whom they are born.

The CULTURE they are born into molds them from the moment of birth, the beliefs, the customs, the rituals, all of it stem from the culture that child is born into. It's how they are raised, it's what they know and learn.

Now, here in America, we are blessed to be born into THE greatest nation on earth, with all our freedoms. No other country even comes close--and I think that's illustrated by all those who are coming here, legally or illegally.

Those that are raised in a culture of hate and violence learn hate and violence--again, it doesn't make the person inferior at all--it makes the culture inferior in what it has taught that person.

Then you have those that "buck" their culture, that yearn for something more than the hate and violence--and we're seeing it in Iraq with those struggling for freedom, perhaps for the first time in generations. They're not inferior people, they're trying to break out of an inferior culture. And they're condemned for it.

That's why I gave you the link I gave you above--the Muslims Against Sharia link.

Cultures mold people--it's only rarely people mold cultures and then only when there's a breaking point. And I think that is indeed what our founding fathers were thinking.
Miss Beth | Homepage | 09.22.07 - 10:24 pm | #

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Here are two links which shows what Beth is saying. One is called Spoonfed Hatred, morning, noon and night:

http://wwwwakeupamericans-spree....g-noon-and.html

The other is the Nature of our enemy:

http://wwwwakeupamericans-spree....-our-enemy.html

Add those to the link Beth gave and I think it will help.
spree | Homepage | 09.22.07 - 10:28 pm | #

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Hey Spree, where'd you get that cool "I Stand With Israel" Banner in your top left corner? I WANT ONE!!!
Miss Beth | Homepage | 09.22.07 - 10:52 pm | #

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Let me grab the URL for you Beth.
spree | Homepage | 09.22.07 - 11:07 pm | #

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Beth, easier to just slap it on your site, want me to?

http://blogadswap.com/cornerbanners.htm


spree | Homepage | 09.22.07 - 11:08 pm | #

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Got it up...and the other one in the other corner--to me they're complimentary! Thanks! have them bookmarked now.
Miss Beth | Homepage | 09.22.07 - 11:27 pm | #

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

All right. I've stepped back for a while and collected my thoughts. And here they are.
If I thought that what this country needed right now was more tolerance and understanding, I'd be calling for more tolerance and understanding. Unfortunately, that is exactly what this country does not need right now. What this country needs right now is clarity and honesty and courage. After having given this whole subject a great deal of thought, I would not change one word of what I wrote -- but I would change two or three words that I mispelled.

We have been, and are being emasculated by Political Correctness. We refuse to acknowledge the enemy even while they're threatening to kill our children. If I sound angry, I am angry. When our enemies start threatening to blow up our school children it has the unusual effect of getting me angry. And I have to ask myself what manner of human being would consider it their right to threaten to kill their enemy's innocent children? And I have no answer to this question. Human beings wouldn't do this.

The troubles that all of Europe and Britain are experiencing right now are not the result of their being racist or intolerant but, rather, the result of their being excessively and indiscriminantly tolerant of a brutal and intolerant violent religious movement. And this fanatical movement is trying to establish itself here on our shores right now.

If we don't start to finally get honest with ourselves we will lose this battle. The liberal PC nonsense that we are being fed only serves to weaken our resolve. And we need all the resolve we can muster up right now to face down an enemy who is filled with resolve -- that uncompromising resolve of religious zeal. What we need right now are people who buiuld up our strength, not people to tear it down -- our enemies are doing a good enough job of that on their own.

We do not need people whose only purpose in life seems to be trying to find something wrong with this country. These forces are in the ascendancy in so many areas of our life. Our children -- as Miss Beth can personally attest -- are being taught to respect our enemies and distrust our own countries motives. Our main stream media is filled with moral-equivallancy and multi-cultural lies. As Faultline has alerted us, even our churches ar being invaded with this deadly virus.

These forces aligned against us are huge and loud. We cannot hope to drown them out with the quiet voice of reason. We have to start getting angry if we're going to win this war for our way of life. We can no longer debate the issues, we have to fight the fight. And we have to win or society as we know it will go down the drain of eternity.

I posed the question in my article of how one would go about explaining the lack of bloody revolutions in Sweden, and their relative common place occurences in South America without talking about culture. To try to explain away these differnces in people and their cultures is misgui
Roger W. Gardner | Homepage | 09.22.07 - 11:35 pm | #

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

[continued] misguided and dishonest.

If we are going to win this war that we are in, we have to start by honestly wanting us to win.
Roger W. Gardner | Homepage | 09.22.07 - 11:42 pm | #

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Right you are Roger!

Those that espouse the destruction/murder of "innocents" primarily the unarmed, then those INFERIOR in intellectual honesty are indeed INFERIOR to all that is honest, decent and upright.

One cannot negotiate with a rabid raccoon.

We tried to "negotiate" terms during a mission that had gone south. They saw it as a weakness and came at us thinking we were "inferior" to them.

We were negotiating THEIR surrender.

We lived.

They died where they stood.

The people we are fighting ARE INFERIOR in all aspect and regards. This doesn't mean that they are stupid.

They are filled with hate. This makes them INFERIOR.

They murder unarmed innocents. This makes them INFERIOR.

They brutalize ALL that go against their ideology. This makes them animalistic, ergo, INFERIOR.

One can paint a turd a pretty color but in the end, all you have is a pretty turd.
Snooper | Homepage | 09.23.07 - 12:30 am | #

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

As much as I respect and admire you Spree, I'm going to have to disagree with you on this one.

I have no idea what this commenter has said here before, but have no doubt that what he said in his previous comments was exactly as you characterized it. These comments today were the first I have seen.

I honestly do not believe that I was "trying to apply hidden intent". I believe the commenter made their intent quite clear.

The comments begin with what appears to be a perfectly reasonable request for me to clarify my statements used in my article.
However, when we get to those third set of comments the commenters intentions become crystal clear.
"You say we don't decapitate our journalists...BUT..." They then go on to list a whole series of familiar liberal talking points to prove that we are at least as bad as our enemy is, culminating in that perfect example of "moral equivalancy: "what we think is awful about them they think is equally awful about us" !!
We are all just the same. They may be just "misguided".

I'm sorry Spree, but to me this is the enemy talking. The enemy within. People like this are trying to undermine our will. I don't care what they say their intentions might be, the effect is to tear us down and help our enemies.

And, finally, I wasn't the one who said "SCREW YOU!"
Roger W. Gardner | Homepage | 09.23.07 - 12:44 pm | #

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

I agree there Roger you didn't. I also agree that appeasement will kill us, but the intent behind the written word can often be mistaken for actual intent which is why I tend to give people the benefit of the doubt and assume they clearly just don't understand that sometime diplomacy IS a weakness because it is seen by our enemies as a weakness which in turn emboldens them.

But having spoken with JMC before, he isn't a liberal, BUT I often see that the media's liberal agenda often rubs off on people that if given all the facts otherwise wouldn't think as they do.
spree | Homepage | 09.23.07 - 1:06 pm | #

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Thanks Spree.
I wasn't kidding about admiring and respecting you. Guess where I got that whole idea about having to quit being so reasonable and fight back with a voice at least as loud and angry as theirs?

However, unless someone else continues this argument, I going to just drop the whole thing right now and move along.

Have yourself a good day.
We'll all be watching the Iranian Devil in NYC!

Roger
Roger W. Gardner | Homepage | 09.23.07 - 1:57 pm | #

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Yes, I will be watching people line up to protest. I hope I get good pictures of those protest to post
spree | Homepage | 09.23.07 - 2:10 pm | #

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

I have someone more interesting to watch...taking my daughter to see Mr Bean's Holiday...lolol

bbiab ya'll
Hawk | Homepage | 09.23.07 - 2:14 pm | #

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

That is MUCH more interesting, Hawk. Have a great day!
Roger W. Gardner | Homepage | 09.23.07 - 3:29 pm | #

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Not ONLY was it interesting, but it was hilarious, and my daughter pulled a tooth ALL BY HERSELF...lol.
Hawk | Homepage | 09.23.07 - 5:45 pm | #

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Well this is what happens when I go away for two days. I miss all of the conversation! I tried to leave my comments below when Roger first posted his article on PG, but I ran into comment errors, as Roger well knows.

Spree, you made a very insightful comment: � . . . I often see that the media's liberal agenda often rubs off on people that if given all the facts otherwise wouldn't think as they do.�

This is exactly the intent of Multiculturalism!

My Original Comments:
Roger your article is profound and daring! You have committed Multicultural Treason, and you�ve hit the nail right on the head!

The �Jihad Boom� is one more �wake up call� but how many more will it take? Multiculturalism would seem to be a subset of the left�s moral equivalency agenda. But moral equivalency is not quite equivalent. For the Multiculturalists, some races and cultures are �imperialistic� and must be �deconstructed.� A perfect example of this deconstruction is in the ever popular leftist �White Privilege� conferences (aka: the eradication of whiteness). The reason relates to your first lesson in self-defense �that we have a clear and unobstructed understanding of what it is we are defending and, further, we must firmly believe that it is indeed worth defending.� Sad to say, but many Multiculturalists don�t believe that this country is worth defending!

You wisely brought up George Orwell�s 1984. �in order to control the people�s thinking, one must first control their language.� This is absolutely true! One of their favorite forms of �Doublespeak� is the process of redefining and expanding definitions until they become, in effect, the exact opposite of the original definitions. This, of course, happens quite gradually with large and repetitive doses of obfuscation. Another popular linguistic trick is the constant use of the �both/and� argument borrowed from Quantum Physics �wave-particle� duality and not always applicable to large-scale human systems.

I�m glad that you brought up Dinesh D�Souza. I just finished reading his book, The Enemy at Home: The Cultural Left and Its Responsibility for 9/11. It�s well worth reading, however, his questionable recommendations are to build alliances with Muslims in three critical steps. (1) Stop attacking Islam. (2) Let them govern their own societies, and (3) to level with traditional Muslims about the reasons for our support for Israel. I don�t know that I buy his recommendations, but I do think he has analyzed correctly that the gravest dangers to our own country are from within - coming from the left.

Yes, �We are simply the greatest, most honorable, most generous, most judicious nation in the world.�

You asked, �How can we defeat an enemy whom we have been forbidden to even identify, for fear of demonizing the Devil?�

Well the answer is you. We need far more courageous people like you Roger. You are leading the way out of this Orwellian nightmare!
Faultline USA | Homepage | 09.23.07 - 6:09 pm | #

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Nicely said Faultline and welcome home!!! Hows the hubby?
spree | Homepage | 09.23.07 - 6:17 pm | #

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

You'd better get in touch with the good Tooth Fairy pretty quick, Hawk.
Roger W. Gardner | Homepage | 09.23.07 - 8:10 pm | #

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Already done, Roger, made arrangements for that for tonight when I took her home to her mother after the movie...lol.
Hawk | Homepage | 09.23.07 - 8:14 pm | #

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

"All men are created equal" does not mean we all have the same inseam, shoe size or IQ. It does not mean we all succeed equally in the economy. It means that nobody is born superior or inferior as arbitrary ruler or ruled. It is a direct counter to the European class structure.

Islam has no equivalent concept. To Islam, Arabs are the best of peoples and Quraysh are the best of tribes. According to Muhammad and his first two Caliphs, the Caliph must come from the Quraysh tribe.

Most Muslims are Asian, not Arabian and are Muslim because their ancestors were conquered by Arabs and forcibly converted. Arabs imposed their culture on the conquered Asians, Africans & Europeans. Why do you think Arabic names are common in Croatia, Bosnia & Serbia?

The genius of the American system is freedom: the right to be free from coercion; coercion adnumerum as well as by force. Neither tyrant nor mob rule but limited government within set bounds.

We are in danger of losing our hard won freedom to an institution that seeks to kill or subjugate us and confiscate our property. It seeks to conquer us by violence, deception, subversion & demographics.

They seized a school in Russia and killed about 170 children, numerous parents, grand parents and teachers. They planted bombs in schools under construction in Iraq. They practiced seizing buses in Iraq and several training here in America. They obtained blue prints and security plans for several American schools. This summer, school buses were stolen in Texas.

Now comes this series of bomb threats. But Liberals can't connect the dots. They must learn the hard way, as Neville Chamberlain learned about Nazism.

When the terrorists strike it won't be just Liberal's kids being slain; the children of Moderates and Conservatives will suffer with the,m. Then it will be too late. There will be nothing we can do about it.

This whole Goddamn deal is not about grievances, real nor imagined. It ain't about our foreign policy. It ain't about our economic or social habits. Its about the Goddamn doctrines of I,slam as established by the Quran in Surat 8,9,33,47,48 & 61. Its about the curseworthy actions of islam's exemplar: Muhammad as recorded in the traditions of his companions which confirm the damnable doctrines enshrined in 8:12, 8:39, 8:67, 9:29, 33:26-27 and 59:2. You can read about them in the books of Jihad, Expedition or Khumus in any of the several Hadith collections.

In the short term, our safety requires removing Muslims from the homeland and preventing other Muslims from entering. Thats right, I said deport them!!! In the case of citizens, give each one a polygraph and ask for their consent to or denunciation of the damnable doctrines of Jihad, genocide and terror above referenced. If they can't pass a polygraph while renouncing those doctrines, then rescind their citizenship and deport them.

In the long term, our safety depends on the extinction of Islam. Islam do
Ben | Homepage | 09.23.07 - 10:28 pm | #

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Ben...the message was truncated but the gist is SPOT ON!!

To me, they have become INFERIOR by choice.
Snooper | Homepage | 09.23.07 - 11:26 pm | #

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

By God that's an incredible insight and thought, Ben and Snooper, and gives me pause to think on it tomorrow...expect a pontification soon based exactly on your idea.

Outstanding!
Hawk | Homepage | 09.23.07 - 11:28 pm | #

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

I am making a blog post of this...
Snooper | Homepage | 09.23.07 - 11:29 pm | #

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

I think we all agree with everything Ben says.

But Ben says it with a singular unquestioned authority, an authority born of deep knowledge of the subject, coupled with an honest and burning passion. The combination of those two qualities is formidable.

You have definitely had a profound influence on my thinking. And so have you, Snooper.
Thank you both.
Roger W. Gardner | Homepage | 09.24.07 - 12:10 am | #

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

and here it is...

http://takeourcountryback-snoope...our-nation.html
Snooper | Homepage | 09.24.07 - 12:16 am | #

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Easy, fellas, I already have a problem finding hats big enough. :;

Sorry about the truncation, sometimes I get long winded. I'll try to reconstruct the missing ending.

Islam does not quit. Unlike Christianity, which had a Reformation, Islam will never cease from troubling. It has been engaged upon Jihad for 1384 years. Its demonic mandate to conquer the world causes it to persist until it succeeds or becomes extinct.

In the mid term, we need to confront Islam head on with an extensive and intensive global media campain exposing its core doctrines & practices. That is the way to plant the seeds of doubt & introspection which can blossom into apostasy.

Finally, it will be necessary to use military force to eliminate the recalcitrant die hards.

Short of Reformation, which is impossible, Extinction is our only long term option.
Ben | Homepage | 09.24.07 - 12:57 am | #

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

When I said that Ben had had a profound influence on my thinking, this wasn't just an idle compliment.

Before I began digesting Ben's critical analysis of Islam I was convinced that I knew who our enemy was -- it was the Islamists. Like so many of us, I had managed to separate Islamism from Islam. I was still thinking that there was some separate entity called Political Islam, which differed from Traditional or Moderate Islam. This is, as Ben pointed out so clearly, a comforting distinction but a dishonest one. And dishonesty in today,s perilous environment is deadly. We have to be able to honestly define our enemies before we can effectively fight back against them.

As difficult as it is to go against everything we have been taught about religious tolerance, we can no longer allow the enemy to hide behind the veil of religion while he stalks us.

As Ben states the issue so simply, but so courageously, it is ISLAM that is the problem. And ISLAM that must be deported from our shores and defeated on our battlefields.

Thank you, Ben for that much-needed clarity.
Roger W. Gardner | Homepage | 09.24.07 - 1:35 am | #

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

HEAR HERE!!
Snooper | Homepage | 09.24.07 - 2:15 am | #

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

I seems that after This Morning bits of news that says that Iran has announced that US Troops are now in range of Iranian missiles, well let's take a page out of the latest Israeli AF incursion into Syria and bomb the miltary arsenal of Iran into GLASS!!!
redhawk | 09.24.07 - 9:48 am | #

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

RedHawk, someone should have handled his military capabilities a long time ago.
spree | Homepage | 09.24.07 - 11:55 am | #

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Right on Redhawk and Spree. I'm thinking maybe we're already planning something. A couple of weeks ago it didn't look like we were really doing anything effective to stop him. But now I think that perception may have been wrong. Now I firmly believe that we will NOT just let him keep developing his bomb. Now I think we really will hit him and hit him hard. Or the Israelis will do it for us.
We shall see --
Roger W. Gardner | Homepage | 09.24.07 - 1:48 pm | #

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Planning something might have already been done.. I think that a plan is already been put in action.. what with the border crossings closed off and all that has taken place with the Israely AF raid... well something that the Demented midget does NOT want to get across the border mIGHT aleady have taken place... you think?????

Its me Roger!!!
redhawk | 09.24.07 - 1:55 pm | #

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Boy -- I sure hope so -- and Hi!
I'm listening to the little jerk right now. Unbelievable!
Roger W. Gardner | Homepage | 09.24.07 - 2:56 pm | #

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Find a seven year old boy among the Christian exile community who speaks fluent Farsi & Arabic. Give him a crash course in Classical Arabic, 'slime & Christian theology and period history.

Sneak him into that well so he can climb out in time for the Jumah prayer some Friday. Let him get their trust, then spring on them the fact that Muhammad lied to their ancestors and screwed them over. :-P
Ben | Homepage | 09.24.07 - 8:07 pm | #

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Beautiful, Ben. If I was seven years old I'd volunteer. (maybe..)
Roger W. Gardner | Homepage | 09.24.07 - 10:18 pm | #
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Democracy Frontline.Org (Australia)
C:\Documents and Settings\HP_Administrator\My Documents\Published articles & comments\New Rules of Engagement - Democracy Frontline - Blog.mht

New Rules of Engagement -

Posted by gravelrash in Islam, MultiCulti, Radical Ideologies (Tuesday September 25, 2007 at 10:31 pm)
An article that echoes the sentiments of all thinking people. Sadly these thoughts are never heard in the corridors of power.

“To be forbidden to make these blatantly obvious comparisons between peoples and cultures, to be forced to ignore these self-evident truths in the name of some delusional concept of Political Correctness is not only grossly dishonest, it is becoming increasingly self-destructive.”


New Rules of Engagement

Earlier this week, in a truly frightening post on Susan Duclos’ Wake up America blog, a new and appalling terror threat was revealed. Referred to as “Jihad Boom”, this latest outrage against humanity involves nine postcards mailed out to nine public schools in the Florida area, containing graphic bomb threats, specifically targeting these schools and their children.

If this isn’t a “wake up call”, then I don’t know what more it would take.

It’s time to take off the gloves, America. It’s time for new rules of engagement.

To prepare ourselves for this battle we must begin by taking a refresher course in self-defense. Our first lesson must be to insure that we have a clear and unobstructed understanding of what it is we are defending and, further, we must firmly believe that it is indeed worth defending.

We are living in an new era, the Age of Unreason. We are being ruled by a ruthless and unyeilding dictator who hides under the benign title of Political Correctness. This tyrant requires nothing less of us than our complete and unquestioning obediance to his rules of conduct. His ironclad laws permeate every area of our existence, even penetrating into our innermost thoughts. He vigorously supports and enforces these regulations through a formidable array of propaganda, misinformation and outright lies.

Like all tyrants and professional propagandists, he propagates these lies through an effective combination of coercion, intimidation and endless repitition. The tyrant succeeds when the people eventually weaken and become completely and utterly convinced that the tyrant’s agenda is the only path to real truth, and that the goal of righteousness — i.e. “right thinking” — can only be achieved by the strictest adherence to his dictates. Hitler, Stalin and Mao Zedong all thoroughly understood these principles and used them masterfully. Their followers were not merely loyal, they were rapturous in their zeal. And God help the dissenters.

As George Orwell famously pointed out in his prescient “1984?, in order to control the people’s thinking, one must first control their language. We have unwittingly succumbed to a new form of Doublespeak; it is called Multiculturalism. We have been told what we can say and what we cannot say. We have been taught the right way to think and the wrong way to think. To our shame, we have meekly acquiesced without debate to this insane suspension of disbelief.

The foundation of this monstrous lie is the incredible premise that all people are basically the same and are all driven by the same general motivations. Not only is this statement completely unfounded, it is inherently preposterous. We have been coerced into accepting the ludicrous idea that all peoples, and all nations are operating under the same precepts of universal justice and morality. The only differences between them, we are assured, lie in their unique customs and rituals.

We are forbidden to even acknowledge that there may in fact be some manifest differences between cultures more meaningful and profound than mere customs. We are forbidden to even comment on the individual characteristics of different peoples or different races. Anyone attempting to broach this taboo subject is immediately met with loud admonishments of “racism” or “prejudice”. However, even more proscribed than a critical appraisal of differing races is any form whatsoever of objective criticism of anyone’s religion — anyone’s, that is, but our own. This breach of the rules of Doublespeak is considered to be the highest form of Muticultural treason.

We are procluded from making even the most obvious and benign observations of the world around us. Multiculturalism has become our new religion; a religion based upon a revealed truth which we have been forbidden to question. To merely frame the question constitutes the crime. Case in point: All nations and peoples, we are reminded repeatedly, are to be considered equal: yet, when was the last time you heard about a bloody revolution in Scandinavia? Now, how about in South America?

I am not a racist, I am a culturist. Culture matters. Although this statement will undoubtably be considered the highest form of Multicultural heresy, I’m going to say it anyway. There are superior and inferior cultures. I realize that, to some, this smacks of Nazi Aryanism, but it’s nonetheless true. And that’s what this conversation is all about — breaking free of the shackles of Doublespeak and finding the courage to speak the truth.

As former Ambassador Jeane Kirkpatrick put it so succinctly, “Americans need to face the truth about themselves, no matter how pleasant it is.”

We are simply the greatest, most honorable, most generous, most judicious nation in the world.
Our advanced Western culture isn’t just different from that Middle Eastern version of Islam, which is causing the world so many problems right now — it is vastly superior to it.
We have progressed a thousand years beyond their backward-looking medieval and barbarous practices.
We don’t decapitate our journalists, teach our innocent young children to be suicide bombers or stone our adulterers.
We don’t say it’s our religion or death.
We don’t murder our cartoonists or our writers.
As Dinesh D’Souza phrased the questions so accurately — When was the last time you heard about a Muslim invention that didn’t involve bomb-making? Or, when was the last time a Muslim made the world’s headlines for something other than terrorism?

To be forbidden to make these blatantly obvious comparisons between peoples and cultures, to be forced to ignore these self-evident truths in the name of some delusional concept of Political Correctness is not only grossly dishonest, it is becoming increasingly self-destructive.

How can we defeat an enemy whom we have been forbidden to even identify, for fear of demonizing the Devil?

We are a superior civilization who has been infected by an inferior civilization who is attempting to destroy us from within. We are being intimidated and threatened and we have been told that to fight back in any way against this vicious enemy is both unjust and immoral. Somehow, and very soon, we must cut through this miasma of Multicultural deception and grasp the truth. We must call a spade a spade. These imminent threats to our very existence are not coming from the Irish or the French; nor the Hindus or the Catholics or the Jews. They are coming from the Muslims; and those Muslims who most closely follow the teachings of the Prophet are the terrorists; while those so-called “moderate Muslims” are, in the Islamist’s view, considered apostates, and for the most part have chosen to remain mum. We must fight back, and we must fight with the weapons of truth. I’m not willing to wait until our children have been slaughtered – are you?

profound thanks to Roger W. Gardner, 21 Sep 2007

http://politicalgrind.com/2007/09/21/new-rules-of-engagement/#_

3 comments for New Rules of Engagement »
It’s good to see more people speaking out like this; I think there is a great deal of pent-up outrage about how our speech and thought is constrained by political correctness. People realize that this is what is disarming us and keeping us from acting in self-preservation.
The writer, Roger W. Gardner, is to be applauded for this piece, but I would ask one question. He says that ‘culture matters’ and that some cultures are superior. I don’t disagree, but I would ask: where does culture come from? Culture doesn’t arise in a vacuum, it is created by groups of people. The people make the culture, not vice-versa, but then it is part of the Politically Correct code to avoid any mention of group differences.

Comment by Vanishing American — September 26, 2007 @ 7:24 pm

The problem is that the liberal scheme of delusions will continue to work its magic so long as we have economic prosperity and things are generally peaceful in Western countries. This makes it seem as though the new omniculturalism [Thanks for that one, Grav!] and our old precepts about material success go together seamlessly. Never mind that the logical progression of this scheme is to meet up with Marxism or something similar. So far, so good. But what happens when we hit a bump? When some factor or series of events upsets society to the extent that cultural and, yes, racial identities begin to show their true colors? I don’t think there is any doubt this will happen, it is only a question of when and what form it will take.

It probably won’t take much to get folks riled up, for them to abandon the false promises of modern liberalism. How about 30% unemployment and the system of social services buried under the onslaught of millions of newly unemployed? People today do not have the general resilience they did when the Great Depression struck. We are soft and helpless by comparison but still just as likely to get rowdy when this seems the only satisfying option for self-expression. At that point the leftist ideology will loose its cachet and after another cyclical paroxysm we may get back to more traditional sensibilities. This time, however, it will be made more difficult because we have *encouraged* enormous numbers of both legal and illegal immigrants to live in our countries, apparently without any forethought beyond a supposed need for cheap labor and keeping the cost of goods– and the general wage for all workers– as low as possible. This reflects, in part, yet another failing of so-called liberals to do what is right for the average citizen, whether immigrant or native by birth. Together with liberalism’s fatal misreading of Islam, such mistakes are crucial features in what will be the socio-political rubber band snapping back on the Left.

Culture does matter. Unfortunately a deranged type of liberlism is part of our present culture and the corrective medicine will almost certainly be quite bitter.

Comment by spinifex — September 27, 2007 @ 2:32 pm

What a nice surprise to come across this today. Thankyou for the nice words. It’s a great pleasure to hear from our staunchest and most loyal ally from Down Under.

I have written several other radical pieces since this one. If you’d like, I can send you the URLs. I’ve already put your site on my favorites list and I’ll start checking it out.

You just never know where new friends are going to pop up on this Mysterious Machine, do you?

Have a nice day or night or whatever it is down there.

Best wishes,
Roger W. Gardner

Comment by Roger W. Gardner — November 1, 2007 @ 12:22 pm

-----------------------------------------------------------------
Published by Political Grind - September 21, 2007
http://politicalgrind.com/2007/09/21/new-rules-of-engagement/

Cross posted by Take Our Country Back - September 25, 2007

Vanishing American - September 26, 2007
http://vanishingamerican.blogspot.com/2007/09/taking-off-gloves-and-blinders.html

The Enemy In The Mirror














Published by Political Grind - October 9, 2007
http://politicalgrind.com/2007/10/09/the-enemy-in-the-mirror/
------------------------------------------------------------------------
"...we all need to apologize to future generations for living a life of comfortable ignorance".
-- Faultline USA

------------------------------------------------------------------------

In a recent article in Pajamas Media, Danish PM contributer and Jyllands-Posten editor Flemming Rose revealed the disturbing news that he had been targeted in 2006 for a possible terrorist bomb attack. Mr. Rose, it will be remembered, is the courageous editor who first published those highly-volatile Mohammed cartoons in September 2005. This is just the latest in a long series of threats made since then against the newspaper in general and Mr. Rose in particular.

To date, unlike Salman Rushdie, Ayaan Hirsi Ali or Michelle Malkin et al, Mr. Rose and his family have not yet been forced to relocate and go into hiding. To date, unlike that other high-profile Muslim critic Theo van Gogh, Flemming Rose has not yet been murdered.

This leads me inevitably to that troubling but unavoidable question, that elephant in our living room: Isn’t there something fundamentally wrong with a society where an editor’s decision to publish some controversial cartoons can be justly characterized as being “courageous”? Is this what our once proud and advanced Western Civilization has come down to? Is this the awful price we have paid for our blind adherence to some delusional multicultural PC agenda? Has our highly-developed, but increasingly culturally diluted, Western Civilization become so weakened, so impotent, so pathetic that it can no longer protect the lives of its finest citizens? Our newspaper editors, our authors and our columnists are now living in fear for their lives for daring to objectively comment on a foreign religion in their own country. Are you outraged yet?

I am personally becoming ashamed to consider myself a member of this cowardly civilization. Not only do we not fight back against this encroaching evil — and yes, folks, it is evil, evil incarnate — we turn against those amongst us who do have the courage to fight back. We call them racists and bigots. We emasculate them. One by one, our weak-kneed liberal Western governments are succumbing to the Islamists’ demands and intimidations. One by one, in the most ironic of ironies, we are losing our freedoms of speech in the name of some deceptive ideal of religious tolerance.

Where will it all end? How did we let this happen? Who fell asleep on guard duty? Who are the enemies amongst us who are responsible for allowing our defenses to erode away and for letting these deadly vipers into our nest?

And I look in the mirror and the enemy is me.

The enemy is complacency, naivete and ignorance. And it’s all there in my mirror. And all I can do at this late date is apologize to my fellow citizens for my complicity in this national crisis. I apologize for allowing my petty self-interests to blind me to the inevitability of these approaching horrors. I apologize for living my little life in comfortable ignorance, for ignoring all of that accumulating evidence, for not studying the issues earlier, for not listening more closely to the jihadists’ well-publicized and deadly goals, and for not heeding the frantic calls of our alarmists.

Finally, I apologize for waiting until three thousand of my innocent fellow citizens were slaughtered before I even began to acknowledge the enormity of this threat.

Now that I’ve admitted my culpability — how about you?

----------------------------------------------------------------------
Comments cross posted from Political Grind:


Cyber Pastor
Roger, outstanding post! We can't change the past, and it took 9/11 for many of the people to realize the "real" threat against us. You correctly state that this is a war against that which is evil. A spade must be called a spade if we are to make any headway against the evil ones in the world. While we can't change the past, it is people like you Roger who are going to help those who want to know the "truth" to be able to learn what the truth is! God Bless you my brother - Cyber Pastor
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Enough Cowbell
I second Cyber Pastor in his assertion that the post was in fact outstanding. Defending free speech is the most important (and never ending fight) an American can be involved in. The past few years have been trying times in the life of free speech, but I hope that the continuing suppression of free speech will cause a rebound effect in which people realize how important it is and demand it again. Cross your fingers and keep swearing.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Evrviglnt
Yes - well written and poignant at this time in the battle. You're a valuable voice here, Roger...
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Snooper's blog: Take Our Country Back
Well, I don't want to be read as pompous or anything but I have been and will remain to be one of those alarmists.

I have been ever vigilant to the threats since my first encounter with this "new" enemy in the 1970s.

Glad to see that you have joined the fray.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Michelle
You? Pompus Snoop??????? Spree would never say you are so neither would I. You're just a good guy is all.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Right Truth
You ask, "Is this what our once proud and advanced Western Civilization has come down to?" The answer is yes. Just this week, Hollywood, Fox, and CAIR had a get-together on how to present Muslims in the media/movies/TV/ etc. Wouldn't want to offend them by portraying them as terrorists or anything, would we? CAIR praised FOX. When CAIR praises anything, then I'm against it.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Blandly Urbane's blog: DeMediacratic Nation
Well Roger, looks like you're the only one - "Now that I%u2019ve admitted my culpability %u2014 how about you?" I'll throw mine in there as well.

The sad thing about CAIR (I should say ONE sad thing), cartoons etc. is that it attempts to pave over truth. No, they don't all have to be evil or bad, but at the moment the misfits from their ranks are causing some nasty waves. CAIR and others wish to paint this as non-existent or minimal rather than do something to show that the extremists are not the norm. Attempting to hide this or ignoring it is far from honest.

It's kind of a re-write, like that which makes Che appear the honorable champion. Meanwhile a society like ours that does appreciate free speech is put down as racist or intolerant because we feel an odd need to bring it up....hmmmmm

I believe CAIR in particular is more a part of the problem than it is a means of resolving the problem. Piss Christ and all the rest did not lead to bloodshed and death, but more an honest voicing of disgust and disrespect, for which those offended were painted as religious zealots.

The cartoons or as I like to refer to it, the "Ink-quisition" were furthermore pathetic in that so few in the "free" press chose to stand up to it and denounce the reactions as despicable.

But as you said we can't just sit back; unfortunately I guess we can't just turn the other cheek and hope our fellow man will do the same. They are ready, willing and able to take advantage of that commendable attribute that we posses and not doing anything will allow it.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Cyber Pastor
I find it interesting that someone here in America would show such concern over a racist cartoon in Europe, when I saw a picture several days ago of an American taking a crap on an American Flag. I guess Roger was correct when he said that is what this country has come to. Don't offend the enemy, but crap on the flag (not that you said that was ok), just my words there.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Cyber Pastor
And for the person that thinks that Christianity is the enemy, I would say that you are reaping some pretty good rewards that are a result of many Christian Patriots who helped make this country great!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Lew Waters
Another really good article, Roger.

To our atheist friends, how absolutely sad to see people who think they are so enlightened, yet have nothing in life to lean on when they need to. One need not be a Bible thumping Holy Roller to look about and see the absolute beauty by design in the earth and our bodies could not have happened by accident.

I especially have to pity those whose life is so void of any true meaning that they feel the need to cruise the internet searching for others who speak of a Higher Power just so they can claim it doesn't exist.

It is almost comical to watch those who claim no belief that cry out to the one they don't believe in when the chips are really down, to save them. As we learned in the Army, there are no atheists in the foxholes.

Keep up the good work, Roger. Man has fallen asleep at the switch and changes crept in around us, virtually unnoticed. Our foundations have slowly been being chipped away and we now face the challenges we do. Then again, it was all prophesied long ago to happen this way.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Spree
Excellent piece and well said Roger.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Evrviglnt
Spree will be joining us on Political Vindication Radio next week!
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Chris C
What concerns me is the upcoming war between Islam and Christianity. The latter won the first one, but the media will help Islam win this time because it works with their playbook. If you think I am nuts, just look around the globe at the places where communism once stood as the ruling power. You will find they are all replaced by Islamic government or a major islamic movement. Almost every major conflict in the world in the last decade or so has involved muslims. Bosnia, Russia, both Iraqs, Darfur, Somalia, the list goes on.

This is not all coincidence, it can't be.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Blandly Urbane's blog: DeMediacratic Nation
"If you think I am nuts"

I don't know if any of these guys would think you were nuts with that comment. Sorry, I think I tend to speak for other comments when I should shut up and just add mine.

I DON'T THINK YOU'RE NUTS! If you are wrong at least it can be considered an example of thinking outside the box, which I suppose it is; just you have made a good point worth consideration. Post reply 10 weeks ago This comment has 1 hidden reply. Show it! Thread active 10 weeks ago Collapse thread Expand thread +2Vote upVote downrogerYou're absolutely right, Snooper. And it's to people like you and those other Paul Reveres that I address these apologies. I became "politically active" on September 11, 2001, and I've been trying to catch up ever since then. Hopefully, it's "better late than never".
Thank you and all of those others for your service and your dedication and your constant vigilance.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Michelle
Hello Darlin!

I have always turned a bland eye to politics, but I can assure you those days are behind me. You are aware of how I feel regarding the apathy of the American people. I find it disturbing. If I were to believe in conspiracy theories, my favorite would be that the liberal run school system has systematically made our children dumber, which created dumber adults and that is how they are controlling us now (whew, do I need a tin foil hat.....perchance a decoder ring?).

But, I am not a conspiracy freak, I just think we have all gotten way too lazy. The 20 minutes of news the average American catches while channel surfing any given week, just isn't enough and no matter what happens, we can't seem to wake those people the hell up.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
FaultlineUSA
Roger you have written an eloquent essay that needs to be widely shared! As Europe now reaps the frightening fruit of its Dhimmitude, America rushes blindly into a deadly embrace with radical Islam. You wrote, %u201CNot only do we not fight back against this encroaching evil %u2014 and yes, folks, it is evil, evil incarnate %u2014 we turn against those amongst us who do have the courage to fight back.%u201D
Yes we must all share the blame. You pegged it. %u201CThe enemy is complacency, naivite and ignorance.%u201D Just recently, and for the first time ever, the U.S. House of Representatives, on a 376 %u2013 0 vote, passed a resolution honoring the Islamic holiday Ramadan and commending Muslims for their faith. Although several congressional representatives made themselves absent from voting, not one congressional representative had the courage to vote %u201CNO.%u201D
Again you pegged it when you wrote, %u201COne by one, in the most ironic of ironies, we are losing our freedoms of speech in the name of some deceptive ideal of religious tolerance.%u201D
Why is the ideal of religious tolerance deceptive? The answer is quite simple. America has yet to define what is or what is not a religion. Any ideology, no matter how inimical to our interests, can pass itself off as a religion. Islam has been hijacked by deadly radicals who want to destroy Western civilization. If there are moderate Muslims, very few have spoken out against the Islamists.
Like you, we all need to apologize to future generations for living a life of comfortable ignorance. I also would like to apologize for participating too heavily in the very technology that has led an entire generation into the fantasy of virtual reality. In a moment, with just the flick of some lethal switch, every written word could quite vanish along with the internet and all the bonds we%u2019ve forged with our virtual culture warriors will quite simply disappear. Now, Roger, please print off several hard copies of your wonderful essay and share it the old fashioned way.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Ben
Islam has not been hijacked. It is intrinsically evil by design. Its purpose is mercenary and its method is martial. This war started in 623 with Muhammad's first razzia against a camel caravan. Enter the following into your favorite search engine: "Studies In Islam" "Know Thine Enemy" . Therein you'll find links to the scriptures which define & exemplify Islam. Read them and join me in cursing that most evil institution!!!
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Simmons's blog: Thoughts on the World
It seems like I'm in the minority here, but I think you're taking this a little too far. Those cartoons WERE racist.

Think about it this way: 1000 years ago, I'd say European Christians acted like modern Muslim extremists, without the weapons, of course. If you saw a picture of 'King Richard the Lion Hearted' (who led the third crusade, much like bin Laden is leading the intifida) with bomb coming out of his head, would you be offended? I think so.

Maybe that was a bad example. My point is that those cartoons were racist. I can understand the global protests of the cartoons, but the violence WAS unacceptable.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ben
Feces!!! Islam is a murder cult, not a race. It has enslaved people of many races. It imposes Arabian culture upon all whom it conquers. It is supremacist & racist.

The Crusades were not an act of aggression against Islam. They were a counter reaction to Islamic aggression against the Levant and Europe.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Blandly Urbane's blog: DeMediacratic Nation
And Poop too! No Islam is not a race and if we were 1,000 years in the past the argument might hold at least some water in that it would be what we were dealing with, however with the exception of Persia it is 2007.

Sim, as you said, it may be a bad example and your finisher is part of the problem; the over reaction and the tamping down of anything that has the slightest negative hint to it with regard to Islamofascism.

If we don't like something we bitch, if they don't they go way overboard and kill; threats of violence and violence are a lame expression; they should keep it more to the verbal, but that won't be happening any time soon if ever.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Snooper's blog: Take Our Country Back
"They" are here...NOW and more are coming. "They" have been here since 1950.

The war between Islam and Christianity started in 1948...the modern war.

The problem is this; we have chicken littles too worried about their next political move to be concerned about those small insignificant gnats called Islamic Jihadis. When Allah's sword slices thru the neck bones, it will be too late for them.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Roger Gardner
Simmons -- I'm, sorry but your rationalizations are exactly the kind of obfuscations I am talking about. Comments like yours only serve to confuse the issues and weaken our resolve to fight back a against a ruthless enemy obsessed with our destruction.

Don't you see? The cartoons are NOT racist. There is nothing about "race" in them. They are -thank God --anti-Islamist. And Islamism IS the enemy. The enemy of the entire Western world -- even the liberal's Western world
Whether you mean this to be or not, this is exactly the way in which the left tries to reframe the argument into a debate about racism, so that they can assume the high moral ground and win the argument. You are the only one who brings up that issue.
I wonder why?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Coyote Squirrel\'s Random Musings
Actually, the enemy of western civilization is religion, all religion. So I find it particularly humorous that you thank god for anti-islamist cartoons.

We've been fighting trench warfare with ancient mythologies since the Enlightenment.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Roger Gardner
Thank you, Ben. I myself have almost forgotten the original intent of my article in all of this atheistic confusion. The article was about how some of us were -- and evidently still are -- asleep at the switch. Thanks for reminding me.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Cyber Pastor
Ben, you are right on target - when they have nothing to rebut with they move to something else or start calling names!
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Roger Gardner
Actually, Coyotesqrl, I find your rather limp attempt at condescension to be "particularly humorous".
A perfect example of the self-satisfied pomposity of the cynic.

And, if you've "been fighting trench warfare...since the Enlightenment" you must be very old and very tired.

LOL
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Coyote Squirrel\'s Random Musings
"We've" been fighting. Not your ilk, I assume, but those of us who believe in reason and rational thought have been fighting against the entrenched religions for centuries. It's an ongoing struggle and I am but one in a long line of fighters.

Allah, Yahweh, Jesus: they're all the same. Big scary imaginary dudes who live in the sky.

I'm glad I've amused you, though Roger. Your faith, I'm sure, gives you great comfort. Much as the faith of the Muslims so derided on this blog comforts them. You've a great deal in common with those religious warriors.
---------------------------------------------------------------------

Evrviglnt
Sqrl: "You've a great deal in common with those religious warriors."

Honestly - what a stupid thing to say. We are talking about a minority of Islamists who believe their religion rewards them for murdering unbelievers. In comes waltzing an athiest who, senseless, lumps in all religious people as unreasonable and irrational - and murderous. We won't go into the athiestic movements like communism and Nazism that have killed millions, we'll just settle for dismissing another self anointed warrior for rational thought waving around a limp pretzel and calling it logic.

As a Catholic, I've always known that reason and rational thought can be found from both thiestic and athiestic minds. It's a humility that comes from being comfortable with who I am. As I've gotten older I've learned there's one thing I can always count on - the hubris of the athiest. That such intolerance and ignorance should abound in a chorus that paints itself superior is one of life's greatest ironies...
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Roger Gardner
Did he call me an "ilk"? Now that's really going to far. Go back and read some more Chistopher Hitchens, your points are getting a little slim.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
courtneyme109
Back to on target then. I am not so sure our complacency is the enemy. Perhaps, and history tends to bear this out, you can push Western Civ so far - at times farther than others - yet when WC tires of it they tend to turn and ANIHILATE their tormentor - so much so that the 'pusher' rarely recovers.

In the case of Islamic sensibilities - it is starting to look like anything unislamic is an attack on Islam. So what? The innate 'superiority' of Islam - taught about, fought for and killed for is a joke. History, technological advances and the ability to think outside the box without the religious police showing up and bashing in your head will trump Islam. Every time muslims complain about something WC should push back - reminding Mohammedists that unbridled free inquiry tends to solve more problems then it creates. Unlike Islam.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Carmelo Lisciott
An intersting commentary...
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Ben
Does anyone else notice that this thread is being lead down the primrose path to be derailed in tangential diversion?

La Ultima Paja





















--------------------------------------------------------------
Published by Political Grind - October 14, 2007
-http://politicalgrind.com/2007/10/14/la-ultima-paja/
-------------------------------------------------------------
"It is pathetic that our country has come to this."
-- Deb Hamilton - Right Truth

--------------------------------------------------------------

Question: At what point does a theoretical political debate cross the line and become a direct personal assault? For me, this line was crossed yesterday, at about one o’clock in the afternoon, when I was personally accosted by my friendly neighborhood bank.

I live in a small, typically scenic New England coastal town. Population 18,000. I’ve lived here for half of my life. It’s a nice place to live. 53.4% of our townspeople are married. The unemployment rate here is 2%, those living below the poverty line just over 5%. 90.6% of our local citizens have an educational level of high school or higher, 42.2% have bachelors degrees or higher. The racial demographics are as follows: 0.9% Hispanic/Latino; 0.6% Asian; 0.4% Black; 0.5% Multiracial; 0.1% Other; and 97.4% White.

Now, the theoretical political debate in question here, which you are all familiar with, is our ongoing struggle to save our traditional American culture from being sacrificed on the altar of multiculturalism. But yesterday afternoon, this intense cultural battle burst full-blown into my quiet little living room.
Here’s what happened —

I had just written a check to pay my electric bill and came to the last line of my check register. So, I reached into my desk drawer and opened up that little green box and took out my new check register — that is, my new Registro de Transacciones.
My what? I looked at it again.

To be completely fair, there was an English language version printed directly above the Spanish language version. And I suppose this should have made me feel better, but it didn’t. This dual language check register is, I can only presume, for the benefit of that 0.9% of our local population who are Hispanic/Latino.

I don’t know what those 0.6% Asian folks, or those 0.4% Black folks, or those 0.1% Other folks in this little town think about this latest encroachment on our shared American language, but to me it means that every time I write a new check I’m going to have to post it in that damn Descripcion de la Transacciones column. Now, I don’t really want to do that. So I took the check register back to the bank and asked for a new one.

Well, in case you haven’t already guessed — these ARE the new ones.

My little bank is a very nice little bank and they’ve always been good to do business with, and they promised to do something about this new problem, and they did.

This afternoon I received a telephone call from the Vice-President of the bank who explained that from what she had discovered, all of the new check registers in all of the neighboring banks were coming in this way now. She said that the bank didn’t really have anything to do with these things, that they order their checks from a very large company. I said that just because they were a very large company didn’t mean that they were right. She agreed with me, and assured me that she completely understood my point of view, but –

Finally, and very pleasantly, she resolved the issue this way. She told me that she had found some old style registers that she had put aside and would mail them out to me right away. The only problem with this solution would be that the calendars on the back of the registers would be old calendars.

What she seemed to be telling me was this, that I could have my registers in English only, but that they would have to come from a different era, from that same era that I had come from, that American era that was rapidly fading away. I thanked her for her trouble and said that that would be fine.

But you and I know better, don’t we? It isn’t fine. It isn’t fine at all. As a matter of fact, it’s very far from being fine. This battle for our American culture came to me yesterday in my own little living room and already I have lost it. Oh, I made my little stink about it, but what had I actually accomplished? A fart in a snowstorm.

Am I mad at my friendly little bank? Of course not. Am I mad at those 0.9% Hispanic/Latinos in this little town of ours? Hardly. I don’t even know who they are. Am I mad at that company that makes our new bilingual checks? No, they’re just doing their job.

Am I mad at those loony leftist liberal commie bastards who are trying their level best to give this great country of ours away?
You’re damn right I am!
And I am going to fight them till my dying breath. I am going to fight them with every weapon I have and in every way that I can think of. And I hope that you will be fighting them too.
We can’t just let it all slip away.

Finally, for those of you like myself who aren’t yet bilingual –
La Ultima Paja simply means The Last Straw.

That Other War














Originally published by Political Grind - October 23, 2007
http://politicalgrind.com/2007/10/23/that-other-war/
------------------------------------------------------------------------
"Our enemies are not all we need to fear, we must fear those that refuse to name them".
-- Susan Duclos (Spree)

------------------------------------------------------------------------

Western civilization is in the midst of a war for its very existence and we are losing this war.

No, I’m not talking about the ongoing wars in Afghanistan or Iraq. I'm not referring to those recent ominous clashes between the Turks and the PKK in Northern Iraq, nor even that increasingly dangerous, but seemingly inevitable confrontation with the terrorist state of Iran.

I’m talking about that other war, that larger, more deadly global conflict that nobody wants to talk about. I’m talking about that increasingly obvious and undeniable Clash of Civilizations, in which these bloody battles in the Middle East merely represent the most visible manifestations.

We have distorted the facts and ignored the evidence in our pathetic efforts to deny the very existence of this greater war, and to hopefully postpone that unavoidable day of reckoning.

While in Iraq itself some promising signs are emerging. In his creative counterinsurgency strategy (COIN), General Petraeus has found it expedient to reach out to those “moderate” Muslims in an effort to form working alliances against the insurgents and radicals, and thus far has achieved sosme remarkable success.
But can these successful tactics in the battle of Iraq be translated to that larger and more subtle battleground in that other war, that growing and already formidable Islamic onslaught against the West?
Unfortunately, no. In fact, almost the exact opposite is true.

It is estimated that within twenty years the population of Marseilles will be majority Muslim. Almost all of the liberal Western democracies are being overwhelmed by hordes of Muslim immigrants, mostly from North Africa, immigrants who bring their savage and backward culture (and their alarming birth rate) with them. The liberal Western societies have been attempting to deal with this growing menace with the pitiful weapons of tolerance and understanding. For the sake of embracing some feel-good, why-can’t-we-all-just-get-along-together concepts of multiculturalism and diversity they are in the process of losing their historical and traditional European cultures.

The industrial cities of northern England have become majority Muslim. London is fast becoming Londonistan. The Netherlands, Belgium, France, Germany, Italy, Spain — one by one, these European countries are awakening to the deadly peril which they have allowed into their midst. Little Switzerland, in its most recent elections, seems to be determined to fight back against this loss of its cultural identity. But is it too little too late? For some countries, the damage may have already been done.

It is a gross misrepresentation of the facts to refer to this monumental crisis that the West now faces as a War on Terror. For all of the terror that can be generated by some murderous and well-publicized attack, the most deadly threat to our existence comes, not from the terrorists, but from these ubiquitous cultural invasions, which we in the West — precisely because of our liberal and tolerant values — are woefully unprepared to counter.

The Islamic culture which is attempting, and in some cases succeeding in infiltrating and subsuming its welcoming democratic host countries is one of the most brutal cultures in history. It stands in direct opposition to everything our liberal Western culture holds valuable. It is a pitiless totalitarian theocracy which denigrates individuality and scientific progress. It is completely and utterly intolerant of any other point of view. It brutalizes and seeks to subjugate its women to the will of the superior male. It responds to criticism or dissent with a combination of intimidation and violence. Those few heroic journalists, authors and politicians who have dared to question or criticize Islam have either been forced into hiding or been murdered.

These barbaric invasions are being aided and abetted by our own liberal 'multiculturalists'. Under the dictates of multiculturalism and diversity we have been forbidden to even acknowledge the existence of these threats — let alone deal with them. We have even ceded the moral high ground to these medieval brutes, meekly acquiescing to the delusions of cultural moral equivalency — as though somehow the beheading of a Daniel Pearl equates with the embarrassment of a Britney Spears. If we even attempt to redress these issues we are immediately branded as xenophobic racists.

Consider for a moment the utter absurdity of this statement:
We are six years into this so-called War on Terror and we are still unwilling or unable to honestly identify our enemies and confront them for fear of being impolite.

Here is the hard truth and it’s time we faced it. Whether we went into Iraq or not, the war that we have had thrust upon us will continue. For it is not just about Iraq or Afghanistan; it is not just about Al-Qaeda. This war is not about what we have done or not done in the Middle East. This war that we are in is a war against a culture, the hate-driven 15th century, pride/revenge male warrior culture of the Arab/Islamic world (in which I include Iran). Whether we choose to see it this way or not, the facts remain that we are, indeed, in the midst of a Clash of Civilizations. There is nothing more dangerous in a time of war than underestimating your enemy.

For those amongst us who still wonder “why can’t we all just get along together?” I suggest that you remember once again that awful day in September. I suggest that you take out those pictures of the nineteen hijackers again and look closely at those faces. This is the enemy. They are implacable in their hatred towards us. They are willing to die to kill us. The civilized West is once again being besieged by savage barbarian hordes, driven by their brutal and uncompromising religion. And we don’t know how to fight back. All that we have learned that makes us civilized now works against us and to our enemy’s advantage.

If anyone seriously believes that we are going to defeat this ruthless, divinely-inspired enemy through gentlemanly dialogue and understanding, I suggest they remember the fate of Theo van Gogh. We will not overcome this fanatical fascist threat by attempting to find some common theological ground in the Old Testament, or by promoting some delusional multicultural vision of diversity. Our European neighbors have already tried this and failed, and their imperiled societies are suffering the consequences of their bad judgment.

Now this dreaded plague has arrived on our own shores. We can no longer afford the luxury of comforting ourselves with pleasant delusions and well-intentioned obfuscations. We will never defeat them with kindly Christian platitudes or high-minded liberal idealism.

Finally, we must dare to be impolite, we must sacrifice some of our precious civility and have the courage to recognize our enemy for what he is and deal with him accordingly or we will most certainly lose this battle of wills, this unmistakable Clash of Civilizations.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Comments transposted from Political Grind:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Evrviglnt
Those are fighting words.

So far much of the Western world has chosen to sit on the sidelines as extremist Islam has bullied its way into prominence. Recently a group of Muslim leaders wrote a letter beseeching Christians to accept peace, but there was no recognition that Christians today are reacting to Muslim intolerance - they won't recognize that Islam needs to mature from the inside out, as Christianity and Judaism has done. Until moderate Muslims take back their religion from those that claim murder as sanctioned by Allah, the West has good reason to look upon them with suspicion.

What is most dispiriting is the left's willingness to ignore the debilitating prejudice of Islam - I assume they believe that any demand for dignity for the Muslim women might somehow be construed as support for the war or support for Bush. This week on university campi across the nation starts "Islamofascism Awareness Week." On every campus the left has come out in full force not to demand more and better of Islam, but to excoriate those who stand against this ancient bigotry. It's sad, but predictable.

And that might be the difference between today's leftists and yesterday's classical liberals. Leftists are willing to accept degradation today if it furthers its goal of political power tomorrow. The classical liberal rose with indignant rage at the challenges to mankind's inherent right to live free and unmolested. John F. Kennedy once said "Let every nation know, whether it wishes us well or ill, that we shall pay any price, bear any burden, meet any hardship, support any friend, oppose any foe to assure the survival and the success of liberty. "
Those days apparently are long gone...
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cyber Pastor
Roger, you have hit a grand slam home run when a person who uses various nics comes to put you down. Wow, you are really hitting the ball outta the park today!
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Michelle
Political Correctness run amok.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Roger Gardner
Thank you Michelle. You put the whole problem into four words.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cyber Pastor
Roger, this is quite possibly your best post ever, and should be kept in a "best of" file. On the theology front, the God of the Bible is a jealous God and in the OT, He got the attention of His people when they started to do their version of being politically correct and worshipped idols or other gods. That wasn't a pretty sight, the same as it will not be a pretty sight if the PC crowd continues to ignore the threat you write about and more importantly our God in Heaven. Again, outstanding article my brother!
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Lew Waters
"The liberal Western societies have been attempting to deal with this growing menace with the pitiful weapons of Christian tolerance and understanding."

Very good, Roger, Well Done. However, in your quote above, I think it is more Liberal Christianity, the left's feel good interpretation of the Word, that is allowing this to be ignored. "Turn the other cheek" does not mean we allow an ungodly interpretation to push God's word aside and allow mistreatment of human's to once again flourish.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Roger Gardner
Point taken, Lew. Thank you.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Spree
Excellent post Roger. You make the points that need to be focused on and people need to start waking up and paying attention. Our enemies are not all we need to fear, we must fear those that refuse to name them.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Right Truth
An excellent article Roger. The problem as I see it is our politicians. Very few of them realize the decisions we make today toward Islam, will have dire consequences for the US in the future.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Miss Beth
I'm tired of hearing about "moderate muslims"--where are they and why aren't they speaking out more? That's the main question we keep asking and yet, it's extremely rare we hear from them. Some have speculated it's because they fear being called "apostate" and hunted down through fatwas--but of course, those don't exist and we're making them up, aren't we?

Let the moderate muslims defend themselves. And I don't want to hear the MN airport cabbies or Target cashiers or those demanding halal cafeterias, footbaths, and bathrooms at our publicly funded colleges (with our tax dollars, of course) are the moderates. They're not. They're the ones trying to force their beliefs onto this country rather than assimilating.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Evrviglnt
Amen, Miss Beth.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ben
The bottom line fact: Islam is a state of permanent war. The institution is predatory, by design. Islam does not make war on us because of anything we do or abstain from doing. It makes war on us because we are not part of it. Muslims are enjoined to fight pagans, Jews & Christians by two ayat: 8:39 & 9:29, which are made mandatory by 2:216. Because of those ayat, Islamic law (Sharia) rules that the Caliph must mount at least one expedition against the Kuffar in every year. If someone wants to dispute that fact, I can supply links to my sources.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Faultline USA
Roger you have written the truth with passion - a passion I wish most Americans shared. I can't add anything to your fine analysis.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
courtneyme109
WoW. to the point and enjoys the added benefit of being true. Roger, this post can only be surpassed with a prescription for combatting this invasion and erosian of America. It is most likely you're best post ever. U RoCk
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Crossposted to Chron Watch Forum - December 18, 2007
http://www.chronwatch-america.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=47949