Friday, April 25, 2008

From Other Sites on the Line: 25 Apr 08

Fighting Back: the 28th Amendment
With analysis and commentary from Ben at A NEWT ONE

From A Proposed Constitutional Amendment by Pedestrian Infidel:

Background and justification to Amendment 28

Article I
The social/political/ideological system known around the world as Islam is not recognized in the United States as a religion.The practice of Islam is therefore not protected under the 1st Amendment as to freedom of religion and speech.
This first article is a prerequisite to the rest of the amendment. We can't proceed without derecognizing Islam because the first amendment prohibits the actions we need to take to safeguard our liberties.

Article II
As representatives of Islam around the world have declared war, and committed acts of war, against the United States and its democratic allies around the world, Islam is hereby declared an enemy of the United States and its practice within the United States is now prohibited.
In 1786, Jefferson & Adams asked Algeria's Ambassador by what right they attacked our shipping. His answer is most informative.

The ambassador answered us that [the right] was founded on the Laws of the Prophet (Mohammed), that it was written in their Koran, that all nations who should not have answered their authority were sinners, that it was their right and duty to make war upon them wherever they could be found, and to make slaves of all they could take as prisoners, and that every Mussulman (or Muslim) who should be slain in battle was sure to go to heaven.

Article III
Immediately upon passage [1] of this Amendment all Mosques, schools and Muslim places of worship and religious training are to be closed, converted to other uses, or destroyed. Proceeds from sales of such properties may be distributed to congregations of said places [2] but full disclosure of all proceeds shall be made to an appropriate agency as determined by Congress. No compensation is to be offered by Federal or State agencies for losses on such properties however Federal funding is to be available for the demolishing of said structures if other disposition cannot be made.The preaching of Islam in Mosques, Schools, and other venues is prohibited. [3] The subject of Islam may be taught in a post high school academic environment provided that instruction include discussion of Islam's history of violence, conquest, and its ongoing war on democratic and other non-Islamic values.
[4] The preaching or advocating of Islamic ideals of world domination, destruction of America and democratic institutions, jihad against Judaism, Christianity and other religions, and advocating the implementation of Sharia law shall in all cases be punishable by fines, imprisonment, deportation, and [5] death as prescribed by Congress. Violent expressions of these and other Muslim goals, or the material support of those both in the United States and around the world who seek to advance these Islamic goals shall be punishable by death. [6]Muslims will be denied the opportunity to immigrate to the United States.

[1] Passage is the wrong expression, it should be ratification.

[2] In many cases, Mosques are financed by the K.S.A. enriching the congregants by distributing proceeds of sale to them is an unreasonable proposition The proceeds should be transferred to a legitimate charity serving victims of Islamic attacks or to the Federal Treasury.

[3] This clause is too ambiguous. "Other venues" should be specified, to include open spaces, parks and audio/visual & electronic media.

[4] This clause needs to make a distinction between teaching about Islam and indoctrination. Mere passing mention of Islamic history is insufficient. Such instruction should be objective, not hagiographic, and should include reading of Surat 2, 3, 4, 7, 8, 9, 33, 37, 38 & 61 and Sahih Bukhari's Books of Jihad, Khumus & Expedition.

[5] Wrong conjunction; it should be or.

[6] Muslims should be excluded from entering the United States for any purpose other than to receive medical care not available elsewhere.

Article IV
Nothing in this amendment shall be construed as authorizing the discrimination against, of violence upon, nor repudiation of the individual rights of those Americans professing to be Muslim. The individual right of conscience is sacrosanct and the practice of Islam within the privacy of home and self is strictly protected to the extent that such individuals do not violate the prohibitions described in Article III.

I do not accept the postulate of a right to kill, conquer, enslave, rob, rape or subjugate me. Islam postulates that 'right' and makes it a duty incumbent upon every Muslim. Since it is impossible in a free society to prevent parental inculcation of their doctrines into children, leaving Muslims in place is extremely problematic.

That is why
my own proposal calls for deportation of legal and illegal resident alien Muslims. Clearly, the doctrines enshrined in the Qur'an and exemplified by Moe's sunna are a prime motivating factor for Islamic violence. Under current law, nothing can be done about it until a violent act is in progress. This nation needs to recognize the fact that every Muslim is a time bomb that may explode at random. Only by officially recognizing the fact that Islam is a war machine, not a religion can we remove it from the umbra of first amendment protection, enabling legislation to prevent its mischief from full bloom in our society.The proposed amendment is imperfect, but it is a good start with which to open serious national discussion of the critical issues involved. The proposed amendment would not diminish our rights or liberties, it would only stop their application to an institution undeserving of them: Moe's murder cult, which he contrived for his own enrichment & empowerment through barbarian conquest & extortion.
Posted By Ben to A NEWT ONE at 4/25/2008 02:13:00

A Note from Radarsite: This proposed amendent, my friends, is what's called fighting back. This is the kind of national resolve necessary to win this war. For their tireless work on behalf of our endangered democracy Radarsite applauds the work of Pedestrian Infidel and Ben from A Newt One. To counter this relentless encroachment of militant Islam into the heart of our free but vulnerable American Society we must move this battle from the innocuous realm of the opinion pages and the virtual reality of our blogosphere into the real world of forceful legislation. Effective legislation, such as this, was the means by which we eventually defeated the criminal encroachment of the Italian Mafia into the mainstream of American life. The introduction of the famous RICO statutes gave our law enforcement agencies the necessary tools to wage an effective campaign against the Mob. As a result, that seemingly unbreakable code of omerta quickly crumbled.
We know that legislation like this works. But do we have the collective will to enact it? Right now, the answer is No. Will we ever? Or will we have to experience some further horrendous outrage to reach this point of national resolve? We shall see. But time is running out.

1 comment:

  1. Note From Radarsite: All comments have been transposted to the next article: "The 28th Amendent: the Debate".