Wednesday, February 13, 2008

Blips on the Screen: 13 Feb 08
















Imam Soharwardy Drops Suit Against Ezra Levant

by Shane Borgess of Political Vindication
http://politicalvindication.com/


Hot Air has the details this morning about the Canadian Imam who initially lodged a complaint against Ezra Levant for printing the Danish cartoons in his magazine. He's now dropping the complaint, calling off the Canadian Human Rights Commission that was investigating the charge. He says:

"Over the two years that we have gone through the process, I understand that most Canadians see this as an issue of freedom of speech, that that principle is sacred and holy in our society," said Soharwardy, president of the Islamic Supreme Council of Canada.

"I believe Canadian society is mature enough not to absorb the messages that the cartoons sent. Only a very small fraction of Canadian media decided to publish those cartoons."

Do you see that last line? That is Soharwardy dancing in the end zone. In his world, everyone must peg their freedoms to his sensitivities, and the fact that so many magazines were unwilling to risk their lives printing obnoxious, but ultimately harmless cartoons is a victory for Islam, and he's reminding us of that. His quip that he believes Canadians are mature enough not to absorb the messages the cartoons sent has nothing to do with why he sued Levant - Imam Soharwardy believed the cartoons were an offense against Mohammad. He believes that infidels must follow Quranic law just as Muslims do, and that means no pictures of Mohammed and certainly no insults against him either. We're all Muslims now.

Ezra Levant sees this for what it is, a public relations ploy by the Imam to appear magnanimous even as he backhands the country he has chosen to live in.

For two years, this corrupt, radical imam has hunted me using the resources of the taxpayers of Alberta for the "thought crime" of publishing a cartoon he didn't like. I had a preliminary discussion with my lawyer today. My aim is to file an abuse of process claim in the Court of Queen's Bench within the month. Whether or not I sue the commission itself, and its inquisitor Shirlene McGovern, is something I haven't discussed yet with my lawyers.

When the chief complainant in a two-year censorship exercise admits the whole thing was improper, an abuse of process suit is not just about recouping my losses. It's about holding a little fascist, and the government agency he hijacked, to account, and having grown-ups -- that is, real judges in real courts -- tell them that what they've been doing is morally and legally wrong.

Fight on, brother. To give an inch in this fight is to lose mile in the next.

Flashback: Outraged Canadian Asserts Bloody Right To Post Danish Cartoons

Blips on the Screen: 13 Feb 08















Revolution Muslim.Com: Any Questions?










Hat tip to Robert Nelson of Operation America Rising:
http://www.operationamericarising.com/index2.html

We in America are getting used to new and even more hateful outrages daily; but some are worse than others. This latest from the heart of New York City itself. If you still have any doubts about these "peaceful muslims" intentions here in the U.S. read on:


An ACT! for America supporter in New York recently came across a group of Muslims who were handing out flyers. She got in line to take one and alerted us to what was being distributed.

We direct you to www.revolutionmuslim.com.

On the home page you will see at the top right a drawing of an automatic weapon that appears to be an AK-47. Scroll down the home page and you will read the following:

“Our mission is to one day see the Muslims united under one Khalifah and under the commands of Allah (SWT).”

[This is part of the worldwide agenda of militant Islam: to establish sharia law and unite the “umma” – the Muslim world – under one ruler, the caliph. Implicit in this, but not stated, is the rule of Islam over all people, as this is the only path to world “peace.”]

“We pray that we may witness the dismantlement of western, secular dominance across the world as we hold it to be pagan and idolatrous in the majority of its presumptions. We seek a resurrection of the just example set forth by centuries of Islamic rule throughout the ages and we hold it to be self evident for the objective soul and mind that Allah is One and that Muhammad ibn Abdullah is His Prophet and that the religion offers the solution to all of the world’s ills and afflictions.”

[This is the call for the destruction of democratic governments and the establishment of the political rule of Islam.]

In the “Radical Review”, January 2008, Volume 1, we read:

“Rise up and ride the peak of Revolution, the time has come to triumph over those that wish to deceive…Rise Up Ya Muslimeen!”

It is important to emphasize that this is not an Islamic organization in the Middle East, but in New York City. And, if their “hit” counter is to be believed, over 769,000 people have visited their website.


To read the rest (if you can stomach it) go here:
www.revolutionmuslim.com.
To join the fight go here:
http://www.actforamerica.org/

Tuesday, February 12, 2008

Blips on the Screen: 12 Feb 08















The Incredible Upward Trajectory of Courtney M.














Hat tip to my good friend Deb Hamilton at Right Truth
http://righttruth.typepad.com/right_truth/2008/02/blogger-courtne.html

Great Satan's Girlfriend is famous!


Semi charmed, self absorbed, self centered, Machiavellian, manipulative, cruel, precious, conniving, deceitfully sweet, materialistic, narcissistic, jealous, hedonistic, stuck up, semi retarded, wishful, lazy, spoiled, high maintenance ne’er do well pixie with a penchant for immense libraries, depleting strategic cash reserves and wrecking cars every 9 months...

And that's just for starters --

For those of you out there who haven't yet had the pleasure, meet Great Satan's Girlfriend. One of the most exciting blogs you're going to find in this infinite, but all-too-often unremarkable blogosphere. Smart, sassy, incredibly well-informed and connected, GSG has created a whole new language for political bloggers, backed up by impeccable research and a fearless, piercing intellect. And -- she's sexy. Sounds like I'm a little biased, doesn't it? I'm not biased; I just love her. From that very first surprising paragraph, I was hopelessly smitten -- as I predict you will be too.

Recently CM was interviewd by a Pakistini journalist. Now, I don't know about you, but I don't know that many people who've been interviewed by Pakistani journalists lately. See what I mean?

Here's one of the first questions:

What do you think sets Your site apart from others?

My unbridled optimism. My passion armed to the teeth with facts, history and a wonderful fully crunk smartassticness that will probably be appreciated more if I could snag more readers.


Now, honestly, who else do you know who talks like this?

To check out this whole unique interview follow the link below. But first, I must make one disclaimer. I am, thankfully, no longer in one of those inexplicable "down" moods, but -- as you can probably tell by my writing -- am presently having the time of my life.
rg

http://www.pakspectator.com/interview-with-blogger-courtney-m/

And check out Great Satan's Girlfriend at:


http://greatsatansgirlfriend.blogspot.com/

Monday, February 11, 2008

Blips on the Screen: 11 Feb 08

















McCain and Petraeus for Republican Ticket?

I mulled over this intriguing combination with a few other minds this past weekend. John McCain is within a heartbeat of becoming the de facto nominee. Originally, I suspected Mike Huckabee could very well be McCain's choice for running mate. A surefire way to garner votes from the religious right. But, that may not be what McCain is after. What if instead he bolsters his "we will not surrender" battle cry with a man of General Petraeus' reputation and stature at his side? A man ready to defend America's position, surge and theatre in the Middle East could very well be the man of McCain's hour. With a Democrat ring preparing for an unleashing of the hounds of MSM -- a brilliant strategy in the McCain camp would be to now begin the careful sowing of Vice Presidential seeds in the minds of Americans today. If surrender is truly not an option -- I can't imagine a more effective ticket.

-- Thanks to Helena Handbasket

Sunday, February 10, 2008

From Other Sites on the Line














by Shane Borgess. Cross posted from Political Vindication
http://politicalvindication.com/?p=1769















Blistering Assessment of Foreign Service and State Department in Iraq Released

For those who have been willing to dig a little deeper than the simplistic reports our media feeds us about what is happening in Iraq, another bunker busting report surfaced recently offering a devastating critique of the civilian performance of our government there. Bill Gertz breaks the story and offers a link to the Departure Assessment of Embassy Baghdad by Manuel Miranda from the Legislative Office of Statecraft. Mr. Miranda has spent the last year in Baghdad working for the State Department as the Senior Adviser for Legislative Framework, among other things, and offers to Ambassador Ryan Crocker his professional opinion on the competence and ability of our Foreign Service and the State Department in Iraq. His general assessment begins thus:

After a year at the Embassy, it is my general assessment that the State Department and the Foreign Service is not competent to do the job that they have undertaken in Iraq. It is not that the men and women of the Foreign Service and other State Department bureaus are not intelligent and hard-working, it is simply that they are not equipped to handle the job that the State Department has undertaken. Apart from the remarkable achievements of Coalition forces in the pacification of Iraq, the few civilian accomplishments that we are presently lauding, including the debathification law and the staffing of PRT's are a thin reed. It was regrettable to see the President recently grab on to it.

The purpose of the Surge, now one year old, was to pacify Iraq to allow the GOI (Government of Iraq) to stand up. The State Department has not done its part coincident with the Commanding General's effort. This is not the fault of intelligent and hard working individuals skilled at the functions of the "normal embassy." The problem is institutional. The State Department bureacracy is not equipped to hand the urgency of American's Iraq investment in blood and taxpayer funds. You lack the "fierce urgency of now."

Foreign Service officers, with ludicrously little management experience by any standard other than your own, are not equipped to manage programs, hundred of million in funds, and expert human capital assets need to assist the Government of Iraq to stand up. It is apparent that, other than diplomacy, your only expertise is your own bureaucracy, which inherently makes State Department personnel unable to think outside the box or beyond the paths they have previously taken.

This is an entirely predictable reaction if anyone has any studied the work of our diplomacy department at all over the last 20 years. There's nothing I can add to what Mr. Miranda writes other than the empty feeling I get as a reward for assuming the worst and finding it reinforced here by a man who has the credibility to make the case. Everyone needs to read the assessment from front to back, I'll only offer lowlights here.

I would venture to say that if the management of the Embassy and the State Department's Iraq operation were judged by rules that govern business judgment and asset waste in the private sector, the delays, indecision, and reorganizations over the past year, would be considered willfully negligent if not criminal. In light of the nation's sacrifice, what we have seen this past year in the Embassy is incomprehensible.

Most emblematic of the State Department's weakness in basic management was its decision to dismantle and cannibalize the Iraq Reconstruction Management Office rather than to strenthen it and to fix its problems, among them inadequate management by Foreign Service officers placed at the helm. The fact that this massive reorganization was undertaken at the critical time that it did, and even while the Commanding General was requesting greater civilian support of the GOI has to join the list of fatal errors that we have made, this time under the State Department's ledger.

The Foreign Service gets grilled:

The Foreign Service's gripping culture of excused inaction is also framed and exacerbated by the paralyzing question of the "buy in" of Iraqi officials in some of the areas in which they most need, and that we can offer, assistance. The obvious reality that nothing can happen without Iraqi support is over-used as an excuse by bureaucrats who simply do not have the ability of conceiving or executing scenarios of institution-building assistance that does not comport with their past experience and over-cautios diplomatic instincts.

Simply put, Foreign Service are nto equipped to manage process-oriented assistance programs and yet we have put into their hands hundreds of millions of dollars. Any American graduate school study group could do better.

The excuse-making tendency of the Foreign Service is most evident in the areas of meeting Legislative Benchmarks and Rule of Law Objectives, which I address in Specific Assessments below.

In this excuse-making culture, the State Department has been an albatross around the neck of the Coalition command, whose leaders and personnel have a leadership profile radically opposite to the State Department's. Among other things, the State Department has failed to assist Coalition initiatives by delaying or failing to supply the civilian expertise needed in a thoughtful and timely manner and also delaying decisions on funding and staffing vital to GOI (and our) success.

Mr. Miranda goes on to talk about important information being withheld from the White House, the State Department and the Commanding General in Iraq for an assortment of reasons. He goes into detail about the staffing problems and deep dysfunction related to information transfer between outgoing and incoming staff. They're reinventing the wheel with every functionary swap (which happen often because of one year stints). His conclusion:

The State Department would do the nation a service if it admits that it is not equipped to the job you have undertaken. Our congress has an obligation to give you the oversight our national sacrifice demands. We are now living our latest error.

As a graduate of Georgetown's School of Foreign Service, I was proud last year when I swore in at the State Department. By the middle of 2007 that changed. I was ashamed for my country. I repeat, however, that my observations are not that you all are anything but wonderful Americans, it is that you are doing a job for which you are not prepared as a bureaucracy or as leaders.

The American and Iraqi people deserve better.

Am I the only one who senses that another great calamity faces America? I may be too pessimistic about the ability of our government to take seriously the danger we face, but the government that failed to protect its people in 9/11 seems to look a lot like the government that claims to be protecting us now. Whether we're relying on a border guard on the Canadian border or a airline check-in clerk at the airport, our first defense must be better than our last. President Bush, are you listening?

(Political Vindication!)

Saturday, February 9, 2008

The Glowing Embers of Hope ?

The Netherlands Bans Burqa




After months and months of disheartening reports from all across Europe, Scandinavia and Britain of more and more muslim cultural victories and seemingly endless shameful Western capitulations, finally some good news! Thank you Netherlands!

The Dutch cabinet said Friday it wants to ban burkas from all schools and prevent government employees from wearing the head-to-toe Islamic robes, but said it was impossible to outlaw them altogether.

Thank you for being one of the first Western democracies to show some courage and fighting spirit [see Spook's article below]. Thank you for saying Enough Is Enough: You cannot take our values and our culture and our history. And we will not submit to yours.

A tempest in a teapot? Perhaps. More show than substance? Possibly. But we can only hope not, we can hope that this is the awakening we have all been waiting for. We can only pray that this is the sign of things to come, welcome evidence of some small but still glowing ember of Western pride. And we Western writers must fan these embers to the very best of our abilities, and nurture them until they can grow into a roaring inferno of patriotic passion. In these small embers lie the hopes of our glorious and imperiled Western Civilization.

We are watching you from across the sea and praying for your success in this virtual Clash of Civilizations taking place on your rich Dutch soil. We support you wholeheartedly and we care deeply. Your fight is our fight. And it is a fight we all must win.

Bravo brave Dutch people! And God bless you!

http://www.topix.com/world/netherlands/2008/02/dutch-cabinet-says-it-wants-to-ban-burkas-in-schools-and-government-offices#comments

Een speciale boodschap voor onze Nederlandse lezers:

In verband met de laatste inwikkeling in Nederland; het eventueel verbod van de Islaamse Burqa, horen wij bij Radarsite graag uw opinie. Stuur aub een e-mail in het Engels of Nederlands via onze Bio pagina. Alvast hartelijk bedankt, en heel veel sukses.

Blips on the Screen: 9 Feb 08
















From Spook at Fire Base America:
http://firebaseamerica.blogspot.com/

Netherlands Bans Burqa











Netherlands bans Burqa at government offices and schools!

Read more of this terrific news at Fire Base America
http://firebaseamerica.blogspot.com/2008/02/netherlands-bans-burqa.html

Update:
It's not finalized yet, but this is still a great optimistic sign.
http://www.sun-sentinel.com/news/nationworld/sfl-fla16aworlddigest02092sbfeb09,0,3273637.story

Friday, February 8, 2008

A Candle for the Darkness: An Essay in Stolen Photographs

by Roger W. Gardner
I acknowledge my deep appreciation to all of those photographers whose work I have used for this essay. I can only hope that they would approve.


Something is happening...












Something is happening here...

















something bad is happening...















people are running...












running for their lives...

















they're falling from the sky...

















the buildings are falling...






















the buildings are gone.















Everything gone.

All those people.

Gone.






Where are you?

















What do I do
without you?






















Why me?
Why us?
Why now?

















Why us?





















We must all come together now as one.
We must embrace one another in our mourning.






















We must search our souls for answers.
But first we must mourn...















Of course...









not everyone is in mourning...

in fact...







some people...


















seem pretty happy...













about the whole thing,
don't they?

Then again...
there are those who say...






















that we deserved it.






















That we had it coming.















They say, that by fighting back,
by going to war...














we're just making everything...






















worse.

And sometimes it does seem...












as though every day...















more and more people...














hate us.

Maybe if we just...

















kind of...








ignored it...






or...

maybe if we..











just lit a candle...

















if we lit a whole bunch of candles...









we could drive away the darkness.

My friends...



















this is the darkness.








And this is the candle.

Latest News From Across the Pond: "We're all right, Jack. Just don't you worry."














Most Americans, I think, feel a certain closeness to their British cousins 'across the pond'. We follow your travails with interest and compassion. What we see happening there has a special significance for us here. In short, we care.

We express this concern in our articles and in our blogs. Many of us are, to a large degree, products of your inimitable culture, and we admire you and your accomplishments. And, in perhaps the greatest compliment of all, we seek to emulate you in our hallowed halls of Academia and in our commercials on our television programs. You represent to us the highest examples of our Western civilization. However, that glorious culture of yours is under siege. The reports come in daily of new losses in this battle of cultures, of new and even more shameful capitulations to these barbarous islamic intruders. And we worry for you.

However, there is a certain breed of Brit -- and unfortunately this certain breed seems to be running things there now -- and this particularly nasty and ungrateful Brit, it seems, is quick to take umbrage with our concern, and interprets our sympathy as interference in their private affairs. These are the people who express their resentment of us with a snooty Old World condescension. They don't like the idea of being judged or criticized by us crude Yanks. These are the ones who write into our comment threads to assure us Nervous Nellies that everything in Great Britain is under control, that we needn't worry about them.

One of these nasty types wrote into an Australian website recently to remind them that the Conservatives in Britain were watching the Libs and "had them in check". Really? Somehow I don't think that's quite the message that we're getting over here. Another annoyed transplanted Englishman wrote in to assuage our worries by providing us with statistical evidence of just what a small minority these muslims actually represent in Britain. Of course, I can't help recalling that the Nazis were also just a small statistical minority once upon a time.

This issue became somewhat more personal to me when I responded to one of these affronted Britishers, who was essentially telling us to mind our own business, by reminding him that their business often has a habit of becoming our business -- like that little business of WWII. To this he responded, that they (the Brits) had been fighting the Nazis since the Fall of France, and that we Yanks hadn't come into the fray until "late in the game". Now, considering the number of Yanks who never came home from that fray, I could get pretty pissed off about that remark. I could even stoop so low as to remind him that, yes, they were fighting the Nazis "before we got into the fray" -- but they were losing. Sorry, but remember Dunkirk? I could even sink so low as to point out to this snotty ungrateful Brit that if us lowborn Yanks hadn't made it their business to help their British cousins in that cataclysmic struggle, he'd be writing in his nasty little comments in German.

Americans are used to getting a lot of criticism these days. A lot of criticism from people in countries that wouldn't even exist right now if it wasn't for the sacrifice of our American fathers and sons, and for the historically unparalleled generosity of the American people. But to get this criticism from these quarters, from these liberal idiots who are perfectly content with the idea of selling their own country down the drain for the sake of advancing some Socialistic EU agenda, these petty ingrates who eagerly seek to discredit their loyal allies and friends is particularly galling to this particular Yank.

We can, however, seek solace in the knowledge that these skewered views do not indeed represent the views of those traditionally courageous and brave Brits, who we think of as our honorable cousins from across the pond.

For the Good People






Bloggers (what an awful word!). Who are we and what do we do? And why on earth do we do it?
For most of us blogging certainly isn't a profession, but rather an obssession. Few of us I think are supporting families by the fruits of our blogs. So why, then, do we do it? The more we write about the plight of this great country of ours, or of our Western Civilization in general, the worse it seems to get. Why do we even bother?

For the good people. That's who we're writing for. The good people, who by their inattention are just letting these things happen aren't ignorant or even necessarily disinterested, they're just busy, consumed in their everyday battles of work and family. We all have friends like these, they're fine, intelligent people. They're generally optimistic people, who feel that somehow things will 'work themselves out' -- they always do. These good people spend an average of twenty minutes a week getting their news from a biased MSM. At the end of the day, what little time they have left they choose to spend with their families and their loved ones. They have neither the space nor the inclination in their hectic lives to study the koran, or to contemplate the inroads of islam in Belgium. The good people of America are busy, busy with the business of making America great. They are what separate us from those lethargic socialistic failures across the seas.

The problem with this of course is that just being good isn't good enough. Being honest and hard-working and good just won't save them. There were a lot of good intelligent and industrious people in Germany in the Twenties and Thirties, who by their inattention, by their silence, allowed their country to be taken over by monsters and brought to ruin.

Our good people are just that: they are good, and we are not angry with them, they are our only hope. When we write, it's not to change the minds of any of those hardened libs -- that would be impossible -- but it's to try to reach these decent, hard-working folks who would care if they really understood the gravity of their situation. They are what keeps us going and gives us hope. They are not asleep, they do not need to be "awakened", they've been awake for hours. They've already got the kids off to school and are on their way to work. No, they do not need to be awakened, but they need to be convinced, convinced that they truly are in danger, that we truly are in a desperate war, a war that we absolutely must win.

And that, my fellow bloggers, as I see it, is our job and our duty.