Wednesday, June 18, 2008

Muslim job applicant: Hire me or else --

From the Daily Mail
How I nearly lost my business after refusing to hire a Muslim hair stylist who wouldn't show her hair
By Natasha Courtenay-Smith
18 June 2008

It seems too lunatic to be true. But here a hair salon boss reveals how she was driven to the brink of ruin - and forced to pay £4,000 for 'hurt feelings' - after refusing to hire a Muslim stylist who wouldn't show her hair at work.

For Sarah Desrosiers, meeting Bushra Noah was not a moment in her life that she would describe as especially memorable.

Not only was it brief - lasting little more than ten minutes - but it was rapidly obvious to Sarah that Bushra was not the person for the junior stylist position she was trying to fill at her hairdressing salon.

Sarah's reasoning? Quite simply that Bushra, a Muslim who wears a headscarf for religions reasons, had made it clear she would not be removing the garment even while at work.

Sarah Desrosiers says she did nothing wrong by not employing Bushra Noah and would have done the same if an employee refused to remove a baseball cap

Sarah felt that a job requirement of any hairdresser was that the stylist's hair would provide clients with a showcase of different looks. Especially one working in a salon such as hers, which specialises in alternative cuts and colours.

Yet the ten minutes during which Sarah's world collided with Bushra's has resulted in an extraordinary employment battle, in which she was accused of 'direct' and 'indirect' discrimination.

For a year, Sarah has been facing financial ruin, due to a compensation claim for £34,000 brought by Bushra, 19, who has maintained she is due that figure after being turned down for a job at the Wedge salon in London's King's Cross.

In the event, the tribunal ruled this week that while Bushra's claim of direct discrimination failed, her claim for indirect discrimination had succeeded.

Sarah has therefore been ordered to pay £4,000 compensation by way of 'injury to feelings'.

Although this is a smaller sum than she'd feared she might have to hand over, Sarah, 32, is still outraged.

'I am a small business and the bottom line is that this is not a woman who worked for me,' says Sarah.

'She is simply someone I met for a job interview, who, for a host of reasons, was not right for the job. I cannot see how she deserves £4,000.

'As for the notion that I've injured her feelings - well, people's feelings get injured every day. I dread to think the sorts of things that people will try to claim injured feelings for now that this precedent has been set.'

In its ruling, the tribunal said it was 'satisfied that Bushra was not treated less favourably than Sarah would have treated any woman who, whether Muslim or not, wears a hair covering at all times when at work'.

Accordingly, the claim of direct discrimination failed.

But with regard to the issue of indirect discrimination, they found that Sarah had pursued a 'legitimate aim - that aim being to promote the image of the business'.

However, the burden of proof was on Sarah to prove that her means of achieving that legitimate aim was proportionate.

She was not able to prove her contention that employing someone with a headscarf would have the negative impact on her business's stylistic integrity that she feared.

Since the judgment, Bushra, who is of Syrian descent and has worn a headscarf since she was 13, has, so far at least, chosen not to comment.

But, speaking last year, she admitted she had attended 25 interviews for hairdressing jobs without success.

But Sarah, she told the tribunal, had upset her the most.

She said: 'I felt so down and got so depressed. I thought: "If I am not going to defend myself, who is?" Hairdressing has been what I've wanted to do ever since I was at high school.

Bushra Noah (left) and Sarah Derosiers (right) arriving at court during the employment tribunal battle

'This has ruined my ambitions. Wearing a headscarf is essential to my beliefs.'

Bushra had a job in a salon in London, where her tasks included cutting hair, highlighting, tinting and perming, before she left to get married in Syria in 2006.

But on her return to Britain, she was unable to find work.

She has given up her ambitions to become a hairdresser and is studying travel and tourism at Hammersmith and West London College while working part-time in a shop.

At the tribunal, Bushra was asked if Sarah had made derogatory remarks about her headscarf.

She replied: 'She did not. She just asked me if I wore it all the time, or whether I'd take it off.'

Although Bushra is believed to have been acting alone, in the past similar cases have been championed by Muslim traditionalist groups.

In 2006, the Law Lords overturned a court ruling that teenager Shabina Begum's human rights were violated when she was banned from wearing full Islamic dress at school.

Enlarge Sarah in her salon - Wedge - located in north London says that the discrimination case against her almost ruined her business

The extremist Muslim group Hizb ut-Tahrir later admitted that it had 'advised her'.

Meanwhile, Sarah Desrosiers is wondering how to raise the £4,000 she has been ordered to pay Bushra. She has spent her savings on her legal battle and simply has no money left.

'I am a one-woman band, and am already in debt due to the set-up costs of opening my own salon,' says Sarah. 'I dread to think how many haircuts I'm going to have to do to earn the £4,000 I have to pay Bushra. This has, without doubt, been the worst year of my life.'

Such a messy set of circumstances, let alone the strain of having the case bought against her, was certainly not what Sarah expected when she started out on her career aged 17.

From the outset, she had grand ambitions, telling her mother that she would one day have her own salon.

'Even back then, I realised how important your own hair is to the job,' says Sarah. 'I went into hairdressing a rather plain brunette, but within a few weeks I had a bright red crop.

'I wanted to provide clients with inspiration through my own hair. Whether they're in a conventional High Street salon, or something slightly different like my salon, customers expect to see the stylists with hair that is on trend, striking and can give them ideas for their own look.'

Read the whole story here:

A note from Radarsite: "It seems too lunatic to be true." But it is true, and it is happening. And unless there's a drastic change in our self-destructive multicultuaralist attitudes, it's going to be happening more and more. It's pretty obvious who the victim here is in this gross miscarriage of "justice".
Can we do anything about this? Can we turn this around? Can we finally start protecting our own citizens first?
Unfortunately, the signs don't look too promising. - rg


  1. Now where, Oh where, did they learn that tactic?
    It's time the West got onto itself. In our spirit of accomodation, and the laws that we have enacted to enforce fair employment for our own citizens, we have paved the way for a dictatorship of the minority which marches over us.
    As Cicero lamented, "O Times, O Customs".

  2. I will not go into a salon in which the hairdresser is wearing a head covering like that. I understand a hairdresser wearing a head covering to protect their hair from the chemicals they work with, but a Muslim cutting my hair is out of the question. I don't trust them not to stab me with the scissors.

  3. Moral of the story: be careful when voting and elect no LibTurds!

  4. Here is a copy of an email that I just sent to Unilever Corp., which I believe is one of the largest suppliers to British hairdressing salons:

    Dear Unilever --
    Hello, I am an American blogger( ),
    my name is Roger W. Gardner. I just wrote an article for Stop the, a popular American website. It concerns the legal difficulties of a London hairderesser who may be losing her business due to a frivilous and outrageous lawsuit brought by a Muslim woman who feels that she was discriminated against because of her veil.

    One of the commenters to my story wanted to know if there was any way she could help Ms. Desrosiers finacially, and I am trying to see what I can do about that.

    In the meantime, however, it occured to me that you just might be willing to help. If I am not mistaken, you have a definite relationship with British hairdressers, and might be tempted to help one of them who needs it.

    This case -- as you probably already know -- has garnered worldwide attention, and I feel that it would be a wonderful gesture on your part to reach out to this beleaguered hairdresser.

    Other than writing about it, and deeply caring about the issues involved, I have no personal interest in this matter.
    However, if you do decide to help, I promise to write a follow up article about your generosity and place it in as many US venues as possible.

    Please read my article and let me know if you feel it is a cause that you would like to take up. I think that you would generate a lot of good publicity for a very worthy cause.
    Here is the article:
    Thank you for your time,
    Roger W. Gardner
    Boston, MA USA

  5. And here’s a copy of an email I just sent to the Promotion Department of the Dail Mail:


    I am an American blogger who has posted two articles about this story. One of my commenters wanted to know if there was any way they could help Ms. Desrosiers through a Paypal account.
    Obviously, I don’t have the answer to that question, but perhaps you do.
    Furthermore, it occured to me that the Daily Mail might want to set up some kind of fund to help Ms. Desrosiers. Isn’t it about time that you Londoners started looking after you own?

    Roger W. Gardner
    Boston, MA

  6. "...well, people's feelings get injured every day."

    Ah but you see minorities feelings are much more equal that the rest of you peasants.

    Thank you multicultural leftist scum.

  7. You might like reading this. 13 Things to Consider before Hiring

    It follows suit to the "hire me or else" syndrome hitting western civilization!